mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Accelerating Conjugate Gradient Solvers for Homogenization Problems with Unitary Neural Operators

arXiv 2508.02681 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2025math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rapid and reliable solvers for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs) are needed in many scientific and engineering disciplines. For example, there is a growing demand for composites and architected materials with heterogeneous microstructures. Designing such materials and predicting their behavior in practical applications requires solving homogenization problems for a wide range of material parameters and microstructures. While classical numerical solvers offer reliable and accurate solutions supported by a solid theoretical foundation, their high computational costs and slow convergence remain limiting factors. As a result, scientific machine learning is emerging as a promising alternative. However, such approaches often lack guaranteed accuracy and physical consistency. This raises the question of whether it is possible to develop hybrid approaches that combine the advantages of both data-driven methods and classical solvers. To address this, we introduce UNO-CG, a hybrid solver that accelerates conjugate gradient (CG) solvers using specially designed machine-learned preconditioners, while ensuring convergence by construction. As a preconditioner, we propose Unitary Neural Operators as a modification of Fourier Neural Operators. Our method can be interpreted as a data-driven discovery of Green's functions, which are then used to accelerate iterative solvers. We evaluate UNO-CG on various homogenization problems involving heterogeneous microstructures and millions of degrees of freedom. Our results demonstrate that UNO-CG enables a substantial reduction in the number of iterations and is competitive with handcrafted preconditioners for homogenization problems that involve expert knowledge. Moreover, UNO-CG maintains strong performance across a variety of boundary conditions, where many specialized solvers are not applicable, highlighting its versatility and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2025.

Builds on

16 of 69 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  4. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  5. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
  6. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  7. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
  8. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 427
  9. 2020Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 349
  10. 2022Blending Neural Operators and Relaxation Methods in PDE Numerical Solverscited by 54
  11. 2022Incremental Spatial and Spectral Learning of Neural Operators for Solving Large-Scale PDEscited by 25
  12. 2020A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructurecited by 18
4 more
  1. 2024Neural Green's Operators for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 11
  2. 2025Neural Preconditioning Operator for Efficient PDE Solvescited by 7
  3. 2024Machine Learning with Physics Knowledge for Prediction: A Surveycited by 6
  4. 2019Data-Driven Microstructure Property Relationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.