Beyond Manually Designed Pruning Policies with Second-Level Performance Prediction: A Pruning Framework for LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Non-uniform structured network pruning methods can effectively reduce Large Language Model (LLM) size by eliminating redundant channels or layers, offering lower performance degradation than uniform strategies. However, existing non-uniform methods rely heavily on manually designed pruning policies (e.g., layer importance and scaling factors), and therefore cannot efficiently adapt to scenarios with dynamic pruning ratio requirements. Additionly, a critical bottleneck -- the time-consuming evaluation of pruning policies -- further limits the feasibility of iteratively and dynamically finding optimal pruning policies. To address these limitations, we propose PPF (Predictive Pruning Framework), a novel pruning framework for LLMs that eliminates manual design dependencies via second-level performance prediction. PPF not only supports real-time pruning decisions under dynamic pruning ratios but is also applicable to static pruning scenarios. It employs an agent for producing adaptive and real-time pruning actions, while a lightweight performance predictor that can evaluate a pruning policy in seconds, significantly speeding up the iterative optimization process. Experiments on Llama2-7B and Llama3-8B show that PPF can generate dynamic/static pruning policies and it reduces perplexity by up to 33.4% (dynamic pruning) and 84.78% (static pruning) over existing methods, outperforming manually designed pruning policies. The performance predictor achieves second-level performance prediction with high accuracy (prediction error < 0.0011). It reduces the mean evaluation latency from minute-level (1 minute and 38.02 seconds of test-set evaluation methods) to second-level (1.52 seconds), achieving over 64 times speedup. Our code will be available at https://github.com/Ma-zx/PPF .
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.
Builds on
12 of 21 references.
References · 12
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
- 2018HAQ: Hardware-Aware Automated Quantization with Mixed Precisioncited by 443
- 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 383
- 2023Outlier Weighed Layerwise Sparsity (OWL): A Missing Secret Sauce for Pruning LLMs to High Sparsitycited by 165
- 2025Probe Pruning: Accelerating LLMs through Dynamic Pruning via Model-Probingcited by 14
- 2025Edge-First Language Model Inference: Models, Metrics, and Tradeoffscited by 13
- 2024RankAdaptor: Hierarchical Rank Allocation for Efficient Fine-Tuning Pruned LLMs via Performance Modelcited by 7
- 2025RAP: Runtime Adaptive Pruning for LLM Inferencecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.