Understanding Learning Dynamics Through Structured Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While modern deep networks have demonstrated remarkable versatility, their training dynamics remain poorly understood--often driven more by empirical tweaks than architectural insight. This paper investigates how internal structural choices shape the behavior of learning systems. Building on prior efforts that introduced simple architectural constraints, we explore the broader implications of structure for convergence, generalization, and adaptation. Our approach centers on a family of enriched transformation layers that incorporate constrained pathways and adaptive corrections. We analyze how these structures influence gradient flow, spectral sensitivity, and fixed-point behavior--uncovering mechanisms that contribute to training stability and representational regularity. Theoretical analysis is paired with empirical studies on synthetic and structured tasks, demonstrating improved robustness, smoother optimization, and scalable depth behavior. Rather than prescribing fixed templates, we emphasize principles of tractable design that can steer learning behavior in interpretable ways. Our findings support a growing view that architectural design is not merely a matter of performance tuning, but a critical axis for shaping learning dynamics in scalable and trustworthy neural systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.
Builds on
25 of 28 references.
References · 25
- 2023Understanding plasticity in neural networkscited by 174
- 2023On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and Topologycited by 166
- 2022Self-Stabilization: The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 155
- 2022Signal Propagation in Transformers: Theoretical Perspectives and the Role of Rank Collapsecited by 141
- 2024How Transformers Learn Causal Structure with Gradient Descentcited by 118
- 2023How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?cited by 93
- 2023How Do Transformers Learn Topic Structure: Towards a Mechanistic Understandingcited by 86
- 2024Disentangling the Causes of Plasticity Loss in Neural Networkscited by 86
- 2022Gradient flow dynamics of shallow ReLU networks for square loss and orthogonal inputscited by 76
- 2022Anti-Symmetric DGN: a stable architecture for Deep Graph Networkscited by 60
- 2023The Implicit Regularization of Dynamical Stability in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 44
- 2024Neural Redshift: Random Networks are not Random Functionscited by 43
13 more
- 2023The SSL Interplay: Augmentations, Inductive Bias, and Generalizationcited by 40
- 2023Stochastic Collapse: How Gradient Noise Attracts SGD Dynamics Towards Simpler Subnetworkscited by 39
- 2022The Neural Race Reduction: Dynamics of Abstraction in Gated Networkscited by 37
- 2022Is a Modular Architecture Enough?cited by 36
- 2022Implicit Regularization in Hierarchical Tensor Factorization and Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2023Structured Neural Networks for Density Estimation and Causal Inferencecited by 13
- 2022Singular Value Perturbation and Deep Network Optimizationcited by 11
- 2023Designing Stable Neural Networks using Convex Analysis and ODEscited by 10
- 2024Low-Rank Learning by Design: the Role of Network Architecture and Activation Linearity in Gradient Rank Collapsecited by 5
- 2022Deep Architecture Connectivity Matters for Its Convergence: A Fine-Grained Analysiscited by 4
- 2022Learning Stable Graph Neural Networks via Spectral Regularizationcited by 4
- 2023Relational Constraints On Neural Networks Reproduce Human Biases towards Abstract Geometric Regularitycited by 4
- 2025Structured Transformations for Stable and Interpretable Neural Computationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Cross-Model Semantics in Representation Learningcited by 2
- 2025Cross-Model Semantics in Representation Learning5 Aug 2025