mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding the Essence: Delving into Annotator Prototype Learning for Multi-Class Annotation Aggregation

arXiv 2508.02123 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-class classification annotations have significantly advanced AI applications, with truth inference serving as a critical technique for aggregating noisy and biased annotations. Existing state-of-the-art methods typically model each annotator's expertise using a confusion matrix. However, these methods suffer from two widely recognized issues: 1) when most annotators label only a few tasks, or when classes are imbalanced, the estimated confusion matrices are unreliable, and 2) a single confusion matrix often remains inadequate for capturing each annotator's full expertise patterns across all tasks. To address these issues, we propose a novel confusion-matrix-based method, PTBCC (ProtoType learning-driven Bayesian Classifier Combination), to introduce a reliable and richer annotator estimation by prototype learning. Specifically, we assume that there exists a set S of prototype confusion matrices, which capture the inherent expertise patterns of all annotators. Rather than a single confusion matrix, the expertise per annotator is extended as a Dirichlet prior distribution over these prototypes. This prototype learning-driven mechanism circumvents the data sparsity and class imbalance issues, ensuring a richer and more flexible characterization of annotators. Extensive experiments on 11 real-world datasets demonstrate that PTBCC achieves up to a 15% accuracy improvement in the best case, and a 3% higher average accuracy while reducing computational cost by over 90%.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

Builds on

8 of 32 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  2. 2020Learning from Crowds by Modeling Common Confusionscited by 32
  3. 2019Crowdsourcing via Pairwise Co-occurrences: Identifiability and Algorithmscited by 23
  4. 2024A Comparative Study on Annotation Quality of Crowdsourcing and LLM via Label Aggregationcited by 23
  5. 2020Open Knowledge Enrichment for Long-tail Entitiescited by 15
  6. 2019Truth Inference at Scale: A Bayesian Model for Adjudicating Highly Redundant Crowd Annotationscited by 11
  7. 2023Coupled Confusion Correction: Learning from Crowds with Sparse Annotationscited by 9
  8. 2021Improve Learning from Crowds via Generative Augmentationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.