mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AI-Generated Text is Non-Stationary: Detection via Temporal Tomography

arXiv 2508.01754 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The field of AI-generated text detection has evolved from supervised classification to zero-shot statistical analysis. However, current approaches share a fundamental limitation: they aggregate token-level measurements into scalar scores, discarding positional information about where anomalies occur. Our empirical analysis reveals that AI-generated text exhibits significant non-stationarity, statistical properties vary by 73.8% more between text segments compared to human writing. This discovery explains why existing detectors fail against localized adversarial perturbations that exploit this overlooked characteristic. We introduce Temporal Discrepancy Tomography (TDT), a novel detection paradigm that preserves positional information by reformulating detection as a signal processing task. TDT treats token-level discrepancies as a time-series signal and applies Continuous Wavelet Transform to generate a two-dimensional time-scale representation, capturing both the location and linguistic scale of statistical anomalies. On the RAID benchmark, TDT achieves 0.855 AUROC (7.1% improvement over the best baseline). More importantly, TDT demonstrates robust performance on adversarial tasks, with 14.1% AUROC improvement on HART Level 2 paraphrasing attacks. Despite its sophisticated analysis, TDT maintains practical efficiency with only 13% computational overhead. Our work establishes non-stationarity as a fundamental characteristic of AI-generated text and demonstrates that preserving temporal dynamics is essential for robust detection.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2025.

Builds on

12 of 21 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  2. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  3. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  4. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  5. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 299
  6. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  7. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  8. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 166
  9. 2024Detecting Subtle Differences between Human and Model Languages Using Spectrum of Relative Likelihoodcited by 24
  10. 2025HACo-Det: A Study Towards Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection under Human-AI Coauthoringcited by 15
  11. 2025Decoupling Content and Expression: Two-Dimensional Detection of AI-Generated Textcited by 6
  12. 2025T-Detect: Tail-Aware Statistical Normalization for Robust Detection of Adversarial Machine-Generated Textcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.