Enhancing material behavior discovery using embedding-oriented Physically-Guided Neural Networks with Internal Variables
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physically Guided Neural Networks with Internal Variables are SciML tools that use only observable data for training and and have the capacity to unravel internal state relations. They incorporate physical knowledge both by prescribing the model architecture and using loss regularization, thus endowing certain specific neurons with a physical meaning as internal state variables. Despite their potential, these models face challenges in scalability when applied to high-dimensional data such as fine-grid spatial fields or time-evolving systems. In this work, we propose some enhancements to the PGNNIV framework that address these scalability limitations through reduced-order modeling techniques. Specifically, we introduce alternatives to the original decoder structure using spectral decomposition, POD, and pretrained autoencoder-based mappings. These surrogate decoders offer varying trade-offs between computational efficiency, accuracy, noise tolerance, and generalization, while improving drastically the scalability. Additionally, we integrate model reuse via transfer learning and fine-tuning strategies to exploit previously acquired knowledge, supporting efficient adaptation to novel materials or configurations, and significantly reducing training time while maintaining or improving model performance. To illustrate these various techniques, we use a representative case governed by the nonlinear diffusion equation, using only observable data. Results demonstrate that the enhanced PGNNIV framework successfully identifies the underlying constitutive state equations while maintaining high predictive accuracy. It also improves robustness to noise, mitigates overfitting, and reduces computational demands. The proposed techniques can be tailored to various scenarios depending on data availability, resources, and specific modeling objectives, overcoming scalability challenges in all the scenarios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2025.
Builds on
14 of 58 references.
References · 14
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2016Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a Reviewcited by 155
- 2020Structure-preserving neural networkscited by 55
- 2022Thermodynamics-informed graph neural networkscited by 33
- 2022Automated discovery of generalized standard material models with EUCLIDcited by 31
- 2022NN-EUCLID: deep-learning hyperelasticity without stress datacited by 30
- 2022Discovering plasticity models without stress datacited by 28
- 2023Deep Learning in Deterministic Computational Mechanicscited by 21
- 2023Recent Advances and Applications of Machine Learning in Experimental Solid Mechanics: A Reviewcited by 15
- 2022Physics-informed machine learning for Structural Health Monitoringcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.