MetaExplainer: A Framework to Generate Multi-Type User-Centered Explanations for AI Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explanations are crucial for building trustworthy AI systems, but a gap often exists between the explanations provided by models and those needed by users. To address this gap, we introduce MetaExplainer, a neuro-symbolic framework designed to generate user-centered explanations. Our approach employs a three-stage process: first, we decompose user questions into machine-readable formats using state-of-the-art large language models (LLM); second, we delegate the task of generating system recommendations to model explainer methods; and finally, we synthesize natural language explanations that summarize the explainer outputs. Throughout this process, we utilize an Explanation Ontology to guide the language models and explainer methods. By leveraging LLMs and a structured approach to explanation generation, MetaExplainer aims to enhance the interpretability and trustworthiness of AI systems across various applications, providing users with tailored, question-driven explanations that better meet their needs. Comprehensive evaluations of MetaExplainer demonstrate a step towards evaluating and utilizing current state-of-the-art explanation frameworks. Our results show high performance across all stages, with a 59.06% F1-score in question reframing, 70% faithfulness in model explanations, and 67% context-utilization in natural language synthesis. User studies corroborate these findings, highlighting the creativity and comprehensiveness of generated explanations. Tested on the Diabetes (PIMA Indian) tabular dataset, MetaExplainer supports diverse explanation types, including Contrastive, Counterfactual, Rationale, Case-Based, and Data explanations. The framework's versatility and traceability from using ontology to guide LLMs suggest broad applicability beyond the tested scenarios, positioning MetaExplainer as a promising tool for enhancing AI explainability across various domains.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2025.
Builds on
19 of 37 references.
References · 19
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 276
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
- 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 137
- 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 135
7 more
- 2018Boolean Decision Rules via Column Generationcited by 80
- 2022TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversationscited by 66
- 2022Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AIcited by 40
- 2023Towards Bridging the Gaps between the Right to Explanation and the Right to be Forgottencited by 10
- 2021AI Explainability 360: Impact and Designcited by 8
- 2023Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetescited by 8
- 2024Evaluating Large Language Models in Semantic Parsing for Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.