ECG Latent Feature Extraction with Autoencoders for Downstream Prediction Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is an inexpensive and widely available tool for cardiac assessment. Despite its standardized format and small file size, the high complexity and inter-individual variability of ECG signals (typically a 60,000-size vector with 12 leads at 500 Hz) make it challenging to use in deep learning models, especially when only small training datasets are available. This study addresses these challenges by exploring feature generation methods from representative beat ECGs, focusing on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Autoencoders to reduce data complexity. We introduce three novel Variational Autoencoder (VAE) variants-Stochastic Autoencoder (SAE), Annealed beta-VAE (A beta-VAE), and Cyclical beta VAE (C beta-VAE)-and compare their effectiveness in maintaining signal fidelity and enhancing downstream prediction tasks using a Light Gradient Boost Machine (LGBM). The A beta-VAE achieved superior signal reconstruction, reducing the mean absolute error (MAE) to 15.7+/-3.2 muV, which is at the level of signal noise. Moreover, the SAE encodings, when combined with traditional ECG summary features, improved the prediction of reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), achieving an holdout test set area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.901 with a LGBM classifier. This performance nearly matches the 0.909 AUROC of state-of-the-art CNN model but requires significantly less computational resources. Further, the ECG feature extraction-LGBM pipeline avoids overfitting and retains predictive performance when trained with less data. Our findings demonstrate that these VAE encodings are not only effective in simplifying ECG data but also provide a practical solution for applying deep learning in contexts with limited-scale labeled training data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.
Builds on
2 of 20 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Comparison of Autoencoder Encodings for ECG Representation in Downstream Prediction Tasks
- 2025Multimodal Latent Fusion of ECG Leads for Early Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension
- 2023Towards quantitative precision for ECG analysis: Leveraging state space models, self-supervision and patient metadata
- 2026From Foundation ECG Models to NISQ Learners: Distilling ECGFounder into a VQC Student
- 2026ECG-InterpBench: Benchmarking the Interpretability of ECG Foundation Models with Matched-Scale Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025ECG-RAMBA: Zero-Shot ECG Generalization by Morphology-Rhythm Disentanglement and Long-Range Modeling
- 2026Pretraining Strategies and Scaling for ECG Foundation Models: A Systematic Study
- 2026TRACE: Tractable Routing Autoencoder for Clinical ECG