mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Foundation Model for Material Fracture Prediction

arXiv 2507.23077 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2025cs.LG cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.geo-phcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurately predicting when and how materials fail is critical to designing safe, reliable structures, mechanical systems, and engineered components that operate under stress. Yet, fracture behavior remains difficult to model across the diversity of materials, geometries, and loading conditions in real-world applications. While machine learning (ML) methods show promise, most models are trained on narrow datasets, lack robustness, and struggle to generalize. Meanwhile, physics-based simulators offer high-fidelity predictions but are fragmented across specialized methods and require substantial high-performance computing resources to explore the input space. To address these limitations, we present a data-driven foundation model for fracture prediction, a transformer-based architecture that operates across simulators, a wide range of materials (including plastic-bonded explosives, steel, aluminum, shale, and tungsten), and diverse loading conditions. The model supports both structured and unstructured meshes, combining them with large language model embeddings of textual input decks specifying material properties, boundary conditions, and solver settings. This multimodal input design enables flexible adaptation across simulation scenarios without changes to the model architecture. The trained model can be fine-tuned with minimal data on diverse downstream tasks, including time-to-failure estimation, modeling fracture evolution, and adapting to combined finite-discrete element method simulations. It also generalizes to unseen materials such as titanium and concrete, requiring as few as a single sample, dramatically reducing data needs compared to standard ML. Our results show that fracture prediction can be unified under a single model architecture, offering a scalable, extensible alternative to simulator-specific workflows.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.

Builds on

15 of 72 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  6. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  7. 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 809
  8. 2020ChemBERTa: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pretraining for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 337
  9. 2021Large-Scale Chemical Language Representations Capture Molecular Structure and Propertiescited by 206
  10. 2022ChemBERTa-2: Towards Chemical Foundation Modelscited by 127
  11. 2022Bidirectional Generation of Structure and Properties Through a Single Molecular Foundation Modelcited by 25
  12. 2018Inorganic Materials Synthesis Planning with Literature-Trained Neural Networkscited by 20
3 more
  1. 2020StressNet: Deep Learning to Predict Stress With Fracture Propagation in Brittle Materialscited by 10
  2. 2022A generalized machine learning framework for brittle crack problems using transfer learning and graph neural networkscited by 2
  3. 2019Phase field modelling of crack propagation in functionally graded materialscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.