Investigating the Invertibility of Multimodal Latent Spaces: Limitations of Optimization-Based Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the inverse capabilities and broader utility of multimodal latent spaces within task-specific AI (Artificial Intelligence) models. While these models excel at their designed forward tasks (e.g., text-to-image generation, audio-to-text transcription), their potential for inverse mappings remains largely unexplored. We propose an optimization-based framework to infer input characteristics from desired outputs, applying it bidirectionally across Text-Image (BLIP, Flux.1-dev) and Text-Audio (Whisper-Large-V3, Chatterbox-TTS) modalities. Our central hypothesis posits that while optimization can guide models towards inverse tasks, their multimodal latent spaces will not consistently support semantically meaningful and perceptually coherent inverse mappings. Experimental results consistently validate this hypothesis. We demonstrate that while optimization can force models to produce outputs that align textually with targets (e.g., a text-to-image model generating an image that an image captioning model describes correctly, or an ASR model transcribing optimized audio accurately), the perceptual quality of these inversions is chaotic and incoherent. Furthermore, when attempting to infer the original semantic input from generative models, the reconstructed latent space embeddings frequently lack semantic interpretability, aligning with nonsensical vocabulary tokens. These findings highlight a critical limitation. multimodal latent spaces, primarily optimized for specific forward tasks, do not inherently possess the structure required for robust and interpretable inverse mappings. Our work underscores the need for further research into developing truly semantically rich and invertible multimodal latent spaces.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.
Builds on
8 of 30 references.
References · 8
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2022Landscape Learning for Neural Network Inversioncited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.