mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CapRecover: A Cross-Modality Feature Inversion Attack Framework on Vision Language Models

arXiv 2507.22828 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

As Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in split-DNN configurations--with visual encoders (e.g., ResNet, ViT) operating on user devices and sending intermediate features to the cloud--there is a growing privacy risk from semantic information leakage. Existing approaches to reconstructing images from these intermediate features often result in blurry, semantically ambiguous images. To directly address semantic leakage, we propose CapRecover, a cross-modality inversion framework that recovers high-level semantic content, such as labels or captions, directly from intermediate features without image reconstruction. We evaluate CapRecover on multiple datasets and victim models, demonstrating strong performance in semantic recovery. Specifically, CapRecover achieves up to 92.71% Top-1 label accuracy on CIFAR-10 and generates fluent captions from ResNet50 features on COCO2017 with ROUGE-L scores up to 0.52. Our analysis further reveals that deeper convolutional layers encode significantly more semantic information compared to shallow layers. To mitigate semantic leakage, we introduce a simple yet effective protection method: adding random noise to intermediate features at each layer and removing the noise in the next layer. Experimental results show that this approach prevents semantic leakage without additional training costs. Our code is available at https://jus1mple.github.io/Image2CaptionAttack.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks3 Apr
  2. 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Prompts9 Nov

Other references · 12

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  6. 2022EfficientFormer: Vision Transformers at MobileNet Speedcited by 241
  7. 2023Improving Multimodal Datasets with Image Captioningcited by 93
  8. 2023Prompt Stealing Attacks Against Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 51
  9. 2024A Stealthy Wrongdoer: Feature-Oriented Reconstruction Attack against Split Learningcited by 17
  10. 2024SplitLLM: Collaborative Inference of LLMs for Model Placement and Throughput Optimizationcited by 11
  11. 2023Passive Inference Attacks on Split Learning via Adversarial Regularizationcited by 9
  12. 2025Secure Federated XGBoost with CUDA-accelerated Homomorphic Encryption via NVIDIA FLAREcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Do Vision-Language Models Leak What They Learn? Adaptive Token-Weighted Model Inversion Attacks
  2. 2026One Modality to Forget Them All: Enhancing Cross-Modal Unlearning in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Backdoor Attack on Vision Language Models with Stealthy Semantic Manipulation
  4. 2026Single-Sample Black-Box Membership Inference Attack against Vision-Language Models via Cross-modal Semantic Alignment
  5. 2025Revisiting CroPA: A Reproducibility Study and Enhancements for Cross-Prompt Adversarial Transferability in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Diffusion-based Cumulative Adversarial Purification for Vision Language Models
  7. 2026It Takes Little to Rewrite Perception: Targeted Semantic Substitution in Vision-Language Models at ε≤ 4/255
  8. 2026Corrupted but Correct: Why Vision-Language Models Lie to Themselves Internally