The Risks and Detection of Overestimated Privacy Protection in Voice Anonymisation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Voice anonymisation aims to conceal the voice identity of speakers in speech recordings. Privacy protection is usually estimated from the difficulty of using a speaker verification system to re-identify the speaker post-anonymisation. Performance assessments are therefore dependent on the verification model as well as the anonymisation system. There is hence potential for privacy protection to be overestimated when the verification system is poorly trained, perhaps with mismatched data. In this paper, we demonstrate the insidious risk of overestimating anonymisation performance and show examples of exaggerated performance reported in the literature. For the worst case we identified, performance is overestimated by 74% relative. We then introduce a means to detect when performance assessment might be untrustworthy and show that it can identify all overestimation scenarios presented in the paper. Our solution is openly available as a fork of the 2024 VoicePrivacy Challenge evaluation toolkit.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026The Third VoicePrivacy Challenge: Preserving Emotional Expressiveness and Linguistic Content in Voice Anonymizationcited by 8
- 2026DAST: A Dual-Stream Voice Anonymization Attacker with Staged Trainingcited by 1
- 2025Improving the Speaker Anonymization Evaluation's Robustness to Target Speakers with Adversarial Learningcited by 0
- 2026DAST: A Dual-Stream Voice Anonymization Attacker with Staged Training13 Mar 2026
- 2026The Third VoicePrivacy Challenge: Preserving Emotional Expressiveness and Linguistic Content in Voice Anonymization17 Jan 2026
- 2025Improving the Speaker Anonymization Evaluation's Robustness to Target Speakers with Adversarial Learning13 Aug 2025