A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Negation for NLP and Neural Retrievers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding and solving complex reasoning tasks is vital for addressing the information needs of a user. Although dense neural models learn contextualised embeddings, they still underperform on queries containing negation. To understand this phenomenon, we study negation in both traditional neural information retrieval and LLM-based models. We (1) introduce a taxonomy of negation that derives from philosophical, linguistic, and logical definitions; (2) generate two benchmark datasets that can be used to evaluate the performance of neural information retrieval models and to fine-tune models for a more robust performance on negation; and (3) propose a logic-based classification mechanism that can be used to analyze the performance of retrieval models on existing datasets. Our taxonomy produces a balanced data distribution over negation types, providing a better training setup that leads to faster convergence on the NevIR dataset. Moreover, we propose a classification schema that reveals the coverage of negation types in existing datasets, offering insights into the factors that might affect the generalization of fine-tuned models on negation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2025.
Builds on
38 of 87 references.
References · 38
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
- 2021ColBERTv2: Effective and Efficient Retrieval via Lightweight Late Interactioncited by 464
- 2020Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 373
- 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
- 2020Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuningcited by 237
- 2023Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Bettercited by 205
- 2021Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 203
26 more
- 2019REMIND Your Neural Network to Prevent Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 197
- 2022Frozen CLIP Models are Efficient Video Learnerscited by 181
- 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
- 2023How to Train Your DRAGON: Diverse Augmentation Towards Generalizable Dense Retrievalcited by 116
- 2020What Happens To BERT Embeddings During Fine-tuning?cited by 113
- 2021Understanding by Understanding Not: Modeling Negation in Language Modelscited by 73
- 2023Let the LLMs Talk: Simulating Human-to-Human Conversational QA via Zero-Shot LLM-to-LLM Interactionscited by 70
- 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negationcited by 69
- 2024Factuality of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 64
- 2023Identifying and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in LLM-Integrated Applicationscited by 54
- 2024Fine Tuning vs. Retrieval Augmented Generation for Less Popular Knowledgecited by 49
- 2021A Closer Look at How Fine-tuning Changes BERTcited by 42
- 2022CONDAQA: A Contrastive Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Negationcited by 38
- 2018Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Itemscited by 36
- 2023ALCUNA: Large Language Models Meet New Knowledgecited by 35
- 2023QUEST: A Retrieval Dataset of Entity-Seeking Queries with Implicit Set Operationscited by 30
- 2023NevIR: Negation in Neural Information Retrievalcited by 28
- 2024A Survey on Recent Advances in Conversational Data Generationcited by 23
- 2022RoMQA: A Benchmark for Robust, Multi-evidence, Multi-answer Question Answeringcited by 19
- 2024Self-seeding and Multi-intent Self-instructing LLMs for Generating Intent-aware Information-Seeking dialogscited by 18
- 2020Compositional and Lexical Semantics in RoBERTa, BERT and DistilBERT: A Case Study on CoQAcited by 12
- 2022Entity-aware Transformers for Entity Searchcited by 10
- 2025Reproducing NevIR: Negation in Neural Information Retrievalcited by 7
- 2020An Analysis of the Utility of Explicit Negative Examples to Improve the Syntactic Abilities of Neural Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025Constructing Set-Compositional and Negated Representations for First-Stage Rankingcited by 5
- 2023MAQA: A Multimodal QA Benchmark for Negationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitationcited by 5
- 2026Taxonomy of the Retrieval System Framework: Pitfalls and Paradigmscited by 4
- 2026OrLog: Resolving Complex Queries with LLMs and Probabilistic Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Tutorial on Reasoning for IR & IR for Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Tutorial on Reasoning for IR & IR for Reasoning3 Feb 2026
- 2026OrLog: Resolving Complex Queries with LLMs and Probabilistic Reasoning30 Jan 2026
- 2026Taxonomy of the Retrieval System Framework: Pitfalls and Paradigms27 Jan 2026
- 2025Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation21 Oct 2025