mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Trusted Onboard AI: Advancing Small Satellite Operations using Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2507.22198 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2025eess.SY cs.RO cs.SYcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for robot navigation and UAV control

Abstract (arXiv)

A RL (Reinforcement Learning) algorithm was developed for command automation onboard a 3U CubeSat. This effort focused on the implementation of macro control action RL, a technique in which an onboard agent is provided with compiled information based on live telemetry as its observation. The agent uses this information to produce high-level actions, such as adjusting attitude to solar pointing, which are then translated into control algorithms and executed through lower-level instructions. Once trust in the onboard agent is established, real-time environmental information can be leveraged for faster response times and reduced reliance on ground control. The approach not only focuses on developing an RL algorithm for a specific satellite but also sets a precedent for integrating trusted AI into onboard systems. This research builds on previous work in three areas: (1) RL algorithms for issuing high-level commands that are translated into low-level executable instructions; (2) the deployment of AI inference models interfaced with live operational systems, particularly onboard spacecraft; and (3) strategies for building trust in AI systems, especially for remote and autonomous applications. Existing RL research for satellite control is largely limited to simulation-based experiments; in this work, these techniques are tailored by constructing a digital twin of a specific spacecraft and training the RL agent to issue macro actions in this simulated environment. The policy of the trained agent is copied to an isolated environment, where it is fed compiled information about the satellite to make inference predictions, thereby demonstrating the RL algorithm's validity on orbit without granting it command authority. This process enables safe comparison of the algorithm's predictions against actual satellite behavior and ensures operation within expected parameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for robot navigation and UAV control, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 4 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2025.

Builds on

4 of 24 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  3. 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 527
  4. 2024Starling Formation-Flying Optical Experiment: Initial Operations and Flight Resultscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RL-AVIST: Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Visual Inspection of Space Targets
  2. 2025OrbitZoo: Real Orbital Systems Challenges for Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Close-Proximity Satellite Operations through Deep Reinforcement Learning and Terrestrial Testing Environments
  4. 2025The Safe Trusted Autonomy for Responsible Space Program ↗
  5. 2025LeLaR: The First In-Orbit Demonstration of an AI-Based Satellite Attitude Controller
  6. 2024Run Time Assured Reinforcement Learning for Six Degree-of-Freedom Spacecraft Inspection
  7. 2025Crossing the Sim2Real Gap Between Simulation and Ground Testing to Space Deployment of Autonomous Free-flyer Control
  8. 2024TRUST-UP: Trustworthy Reinforcement learning Using Safe Techniques for UAV Pursuit