mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-fidelity Bayesian Data-Driven Design of Energy Absorbing Spinodoid Cellular Structures

arXiv 2507.22079 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2025cs.LG cond-mat.mtrl-scicited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Finite element (FE) simulations of structures and materials are getting increasingly more accurate, but also more computationally expensive as a collateral result. This development happens in parallel with a growing demand of data-driven design. To reconcile the two, a robust and data-efficient optimization method called Bayesian optimization (BO) has been previously established as a technique to optimize expensive objective functions. In parallel, the mesh width of an FE model can be exploited to evaluate an objective at a lower or higher fidelity (cost & accuracy) level. The multi-fidelity setting applied to BO, called multi-fidelity BO (MFBO), has also seen previous success. However, BO and MFBO have not seen a direct comparison with when faced with with a real-life engineering problem, such as metamaterial design for deformation and absorption qualities. Moreover, sampling quality and assessing design parameter sensitivity is often an underrepresented part of data-driven design. This paper aims to address these shortcomings by employing Sobol' samples with variance-based sensitivity analysis in order to reduce design problem complexity. Furthermore, this work describes, implements, applies and compares the performance BO with that MFBO when maximizing the energy absorption (EA) problem of spinodoid cellular structures is concerned. The findings show that MFBO is an effective way to maximize the EA of a spinodoid structure and is able to outperform BO by up to 11% across various hyperparameter settings. The results, which are made open-source, serve to support the utility of multi-fidelity techniques across expensive data-driven design problems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.

Builds on

12 of 74 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
  2. 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 149
  3. 2017Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimisation with Continuous Approximationscited by 121
  4. 2015Batch Bayesian Optimization via Local Penalizationcited by 104
  5. 2020Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization via Deep Neural Networkscited by 46
  6. 2021Bayesian Optimization with High-Dimensional Outputscited by 32
  7. 2020Data-driven topology optimization of spinodoid metamaterials with seamlessly tunable anisotropycited by 23
  8. 2019An Efficient Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization Approach for Analog Circuit Synthesiscited by 9
  9. 2021Leveraging Trust for Joint Multi-Objective and Multi-Fidelity Optimizationcited by 7
  10. 2021Spiderweb nanomechanical resonators via Bayesian optimization: inspired by nature and guided by machine learningcited by 6
  11. 2024Multi-objective Bayesian Optimisation of Spinodoid Cellular Structures for Crush Energy Absorptioncited by 2
  12. 2023Inverse designing surface curvatures by deep learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.