Improving Task Diversity in Label Efficient Supervised Finetuning of LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse domains, but developing high-performing models for specialized applications often requires substantial human annotation -- a process that is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive. In this paper, we address the label-efficient learning problem for supervised finetuning (SFT) by leveraging task-diversity as a fundamental principle for effective data selection. This is markedly different from existing methods based on the prompt-diversity. Our approach is based on two key observations: 1) task labels for different prompts are often readily available; 2) pre-trained models have significantly varying levels of confidence across tasks. We combine these facts to devise a simple yet effective sampling strategy: we select examples across tasks using an inverse confidence weighting strategy. This produces models comparable to or better than those trained with more complex sampling procedures, while being significantly easier to implement and less computationally intensive. Notably, our experimental results demonstrate that this method can achieve better accuracy than training on the complete dataset (a 4% increase in MMLU score). Across various annotation budgets and two instruction finetuning datasets, our algorithm consistently performs at or above the level of the best existing methods, while reducing annotation costs by up to 80%.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2025.
Builds on
20 of 35 references.
References · 20
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
- 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
- 2025SFT or RL? An Early Investigation into Training R1-Like Reasoning Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 212
- 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
- 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
- 2021Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddingscited by 88
- 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
- 2023Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Taskscited by 55
8 more
- 2024SmallToLarge (S2L): Scalable Data Selection for Fine-tuning Large Language Models by Summarizing Training Trajectories of Small Modelscited by 44
- 2022GALAXY: Graph-based Active Learning at the Extremecited by 29
- 2024Diversity Measurement and Subset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datasetscited by 29
- 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Modelscited by 29
- 2022Making Look-Ahead Active Learning Strategies Feasible with Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 25
- 2023LabelBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Adaptive Label-Efficient Learningcited by 20
- 2025Bridging the Creativity Understanding Gap: Small-Scale Human Alignment Enables Expert-Level Humor Ranking in LLMscited by 12
- 2024Deep Active Learning in the Open Worldcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Optimal Transport Depth Up-Scalingcited by 4
- 2025Optimal Transport Depth Up-Scaling11 Aug 2025