mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bubbleformer: Forecasting Boiling with Transformers

arXiv 2507.21244 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CEcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modeling boiling (an inherently chaotic, multiphase process central to energy and thermal systems) remains a significant challenge for neural PDE surrogates. Existing models require future input (e.g., bubble positions) during inference because they fail to learn nucleation from past states, limiting their ability to autonomously forecast boiling dynamics. They also fail to model flow boiling velocity fields, where sharp interface-momentum coupling demands long-range and directional inductive biases. We introduce Bubbleformer, a transformer-based spatiotemporal model that forecasts stable and long-range boiling dynamics including nucleation, interface evolution, and heat transfer without dependence on simulation data during inference. Bubbleformer integrates factorized axial attention, frequency-aware scaling, and conditions on thermophysical parameters to generalize across fluids, geometries, and operating conditions. To evaluate physical fidelity in chaotic systems, we propose interpretable physics-based metrics that evaluate heat-flux consistency, interface geometry, and mass conservation. We also release BubbleML 2.0, a high-fidelity dataset that spans diverse working fluids (cryogens, refrigerants, dielectrics), boiling configurations (pool and flow boiling), flow regimes (bubbly, slug, annular), and boundary conditions. Bubbleformer sets new benchmark results in both prediction and forecasting of two-phase boiling flows.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2025.

Builds on

21 of 57 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  4. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  5. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
  6. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
  7. 2018CCNet: Criss-Cross Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 718
  8. 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 530
  9. 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 414
  10. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 386
  11. 2019Axial Attention in Multidimensional Transformerscited by 358
  12. 2020Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic Segmentationcited by 326
9 more
  1. 2021Factorized Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 249
  2. 2022Towards Multi-spatiotemporal-scale Generalized PDE Modelingcited by 197
  3. 2022Anti-Oversmoothing in Deep Vision Transformers via the Fourier Domain Analysis: From Theory to Practicecited by 136
  4. 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operatorscited by 59
  5. 2025Mitigating Spectral Bias in Neural Operators via High-Frequency Scaling for Physical Systemscited by 31
  6. 2022Nonlinear Reconstruction for Operator Learning of PDEs with Discontinuitiescited by 30
  7. 2022Incremental Spatial and Spectral Learning of Neural Operators for Solving Large-Scale PDEscited by 25
  8. 2023StEik: Stabilizing the Optimization of Neural Signed Distance Functions and Finer Shape Representationcited by 22
  9. 2025Neural operators struggle to learn complex PDEs in pedestrian mobility: Hughes model case studycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.