Curved Inference: Concern-Sensitive Geometry in Large Language Model Residual Streams
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose Curved Inference - a geometric Interpretability framework that tracks how the residual stream trajectory of a large language model bends in response to shifts in semantic concern. Across 20 matched prompts spanning emotional, moral, perspective, logical, identity, environmental, and nonsense domains, we analyse Gemma3-1b and LLaMA3.2-3b using five native-space metrics, with a primary focus on curvature (kappai) and salience (S(t)). These metrics are computed under a pullback semantic metric derived from the unembedding matrix, ensuring that all measurements reflect token-aligned geometry rather than raw coordinate structure. We find that concern-shifted prompts reliably alter internal activation trajectories in both models - with LLaMA exhibiting consistent, statistically significant scaling in both curvature and salience as concern intensity increases. Gemma also responds to concern but shows weaker differentiation between moderate and strong variants. Our results support a two-layer view of LLM geometry - a latent conceptual structure encoded in the embedding space, and a contextual trajectory shaped by prompt-specific inference. Curved Inference reveals how models navigate, reorient, or reinforce semantic meaning over depth, offering a principled method for diagnosing alignment, abstraction, and emergent inference dynamics. These findings offer fresh insight into semantic abstraction and model alignment through the lens of Curved Inference.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.
Builds on
0 of 4 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2026Truth as a Trajectory: What Internal Representations Reveal About Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 10
- 2025REMA: A Unified Reasoning Manifold Framework for Interpreting Large Language Modelcited by 5
- 2026Beyond Scalars: Evaluating and Understanding LLM Reasoning via Geometric Progress and Stabilitycited by 5
- 2026Directional Reasoning Trajectory Change (DRTC): Identifying Critical Trace Segments in Reasoning Modelscited by 1
- 2025Semantic Attractors and the Emergence of Meaning: Towards a Teleological Model of AGIcited by 0
- 2026Riemannian Geometry for Pre-trained Language Model Embeddingscited by 0
- 2026Riemannian Geometry for Pre-trained Language Model Embeddings8 Jul 2026
- 2026Beyond Scalars: Evaluating and Understanding LLM Reasoning via Geometric Progress and Stability11 Mar 2026
- 2026Truth as a Trajectory: What Internal Representations Reveal About Large Language Model Reasoning1 Mar 2026
- 2026Directional Reasoning Trajectory Change (DRTC): Identifying Critical Trace Segments in Reasoning Models17 Feb 2026
- 2025REMA: A Unified Reasoning Manifold Framework for Interpreting Large Language Model26 Sep 2025
- 2025Semantic Attractors and the Emergence of Meaning: Towards a Teleological Model of AGI21 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Curved Inference II: Sleeper Agent Geometry - Extending Interpretability Beyond Probes
- 2026Lingtai: What Concept Geometry Reveals--and Does Not Reveal--About LLM Inference
- 2026Stories in Space: In-Context Learning Trajectories in Conceptual Belief Space
- 2026Encoded but Not Actionable: Auditing the Decode-Generate-Steer Gap in Frozen LLMs for Geometric Constraints
- 2026Text Has Curvature
- 2026Geometric Deviation as an Unsupervised Pre-Generation Reliability Signal: Probing LLM Representations for Answerability
- 2025The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Space
- 2026The Confidence Manifold: Geometric Structure of Correctness Representations in Language Models