Product vs. Process: Exploring EFL Students' Editing of AI-Generated Text for Expository Writing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text generated by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots is increasingly used in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing contexts, yet its impact on students' expository writing process and compositions remains understudied. This research examines how EFL secondary students edit AI-generated text. Exploring editing behaviors in their expository writing process and in expository compositions, and their effect on human-rated scores for content, organization, language, and overall quality. Participants were 39 Hong Kong secondary students who wrote an expository composition with AI chatbots in a workshop. A convergent design was employed to analyze their screen recordings and compositions to examine students' editing behaviors and writing qualities. Analytical methods included qualitative coding, descriptive statistics, temporal sequence analysis, human-rated scoring, and multiple linear regression analysis. We analyzed over 260 edits per dataset, and identified two editing patterns: one where students refined introductory units repeatedly before progressing, and another where they quickly shifted to extensive edits in body units (e.g., topic and supporting sentences). MLR analyses revealed that the number of AI-generated words positively predicted all score dimensions, while most editing variables showed minimal impact. These results suggest a disconnect between students' significant editing effort and improved composition quality, indicating AI supports but does not replace writing skills. The findings highlight the importance of genre-specific instruction and process-focused writing before AI integration. Educators should also develop assessments valuing both process and product to encourage critical engagement with AI text.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.
Builds on
4 of 39 references.
References · 4
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
- 2023Exploring AI-Generated Text in Student Writing: How Does AI Help?cited by 4
- 2023Exploring EFL students' prompt engineering in human-AI story writing: an Activity Theory perspectivecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.