mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Methods for the Segmentation of Reticular Structures Using 3D LiDAR Data: A Comparative Evaluation

arXiv 2507.20589 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2025cs.RO cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reticular structures form the backbone of major infrastructure like bridges, pylons, and airports, but their inspection and maintenance are costly and hazardous, often requiring human intervention. While prior research has focused on fault detection via images or robotic platform design, the autonomous navigation of robots within these structures is less explored. This study addresses that gap by proposing methods to detect navigable surfaces in truss structures, enhancing the autonomy of climbing robots. The paper introduces several approaches for binary segmentation of navigable surfaces versus background from 3D point clouds of metallic trusses. These methods fall into two categories: analytical algorithms and deep learning models. The analytical approach features a custom algorithm that segments structures by analyzing the eigendecomposition of planar patches in the point cloud. In parallel, advanced deep learning models PointNet, PointNet++, MinkUNet34C, and PointTransformerV3 are trained and evaluated for the same task. Comparative analysis shows that the analytical algorithm offers easier parameter tuning and performance comparable to deep learning models, which, while more computationally intensive, excel in segmentation accuracy. Notably, PointTransformerV3 achieves a Mean Intersection Over Union (mIoU) of about 97%. The study demonstrates the promise of both analytical and deep learning methods for improving autonomous navigation in complex truss environments. The results highlight the trade-offs between computational efficiency and segmentation performance, providing valuable guidance for future research and practical applications in autonomous infrastructure inspection and maintenance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2025.

Builds on

17 of 61 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  3. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  4. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  5. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  6. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,487
  7. 20194D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1,208
  8. 2023Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Strongercited by 589
  9. 2019RandLA-Net: Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale Point Cloudscited by 585
  10. 2022Point Transformer V2: Grouped Vector Attention and Partition-based Poolingcited by 388
  11. 2022Language-Grounded Indoor 3D Semantic Segmentation in the Wildcited by 246
  12. 2018Exploring Spatial Context for 3D Semantic Segmentation of Point Cloudscited by 33
5 more
  1. 2019JSNet: Joint Instance and Semantic Segmentation of 3D Point Cloudscited by 27
  2. 2024Reflectivity Is All You Need!: Advancing LiDAR Semantic Segmentationcited by 9
  3. 2022Multi-UAV trajectory planning for 3D visual inspection of complex structurescited by 7
  4. 2018Development of a Steel Bridge Climbing Robotcited by 1
  5. 2020Control Framework for a Hybrid-steel Bridge Inspection Robotcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.