mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BridgeNet: A Unified Multimodal Framework for Bridging 2D and 3D Industrial Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2507.19253 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Industrial anomaly detection for 2D objects has gained significant attention and achieved progress in anomaly detection (AD) methods. However, identifying 3D depth anomalies using only 2D information is insufficient. Despite explicitly fusing depth information into RGB images or using point cloud backbone networks to extract depth features, both approaches struggle to adequately represent 3D information in multimodal scenarios due to the disparities among different modal information. Additionally, due to the scarcity of abnormal samples in industrial data, especially in multimodal scenarios, it is necessary to perform anomaly generation to simulate real-world abnormal samples. Therefore, we propose a novel unified multimodal anomaly detection framework to address these issues. Our contributions consist of 3 key aspects. (1) We extract visible depth information from 3D point cloud data simply and use 2D RGB images to represent appearance, which disentangles depth and appearance to support unified anomaly generation. (2) Benefiting from the flexible input representation, the proposed Multi-Scale Gaussian Anomaly Generator and Unified Texture Anomaly Generator can generate richer anomalies in RGB and depth. (3) All modules share parameters for both RGB and depth data, effectively bridging 2D and 3D anomaly detection. Subsequent modules can directly leverage features from both modalities without complex fusion. Experiments show our method outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) on MVTec-3D AD and Eyecandies datasets. Code available at: https://github.com/Xantastic/BridgeNet

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.

Builds on

20 of 33 references.

References · 20

  1. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  2. 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 594
  3. 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 564
  4. 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 531
  5. 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 514
  6. 2022Anomaly Detection via Reverse Distillation from One-Class Embeddingcited by 421
  7. 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
  8. 2020Sub-Image Anomaly Detection with Deep Pyramid Correspondencescited by 300
  9. 2019OCGAN: One-class Novelty Detection Using GANs with Constrained Latent Representationscited by 199
  10. 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
  11. 2021The MVTec 3D-AD Dataset for Unsupervised 3D Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 178
  12. 2023EfficientAD: Accurate Visual Anomaly Detection at Millisecond-Level Latenciescited by 160
8 more
  1. 2023Multimodal Industrial Anomaly Detection via Hybrid Fusioncited by 139
  2. 2021Fully Convolutional Cross-Scale-Flows for Image-based Defect Detectioncited by 117
  3. 2022Back to the Feature: Classical 3D Features are (Almost) All You Need for 3D Anomaly Detectioncited by 93
  4. 2022DSR -- A dual subspace re-projection network for surface anomaly detectioncited by 90
  5. 2023Complementary Pseudo Multimodal Feature for Point Cloud Anomaly Detectioncited by 75
  6. 2023PyramidFlow: High-Resolution Defect Contrastive Localization using Pyramid Normalizing Flowcited by 74
  7. 2023Cheating Depth: Enhancing 3D Surface Anomaly Detection via Depth Simulationcited by 33
  8. 2024DAS3D: Dual-modality Anomaly Synthesis for 3D Anomaly Detectioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.