Clustering-Oriented Generative Attribute Graph Imputation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Attribute-missing graph clustering has emerged as a significant unsupervised task, where only attribute vectors of partial nodes are available and the graph structure is intact. The related models generally follow the two-step paradigm of imputation and refinement. However, most imputation approaches fail to capture class-relevant semantic information, leading to sub-optimal imputation for clustering. Moreover, existing refinement strategies optimize the learned embedding through graph reconstruction, while neglecting the fact that some attributes are uncorrelated with the graph. To remedy the problems, we establish the Clustering-oriented Generative Imputation with reliable Refinement (CGIR) model. Concretely, the subcluster distributions are estimated to reveal the class-specific characteristics precisely, and constrain the sampling space of the generative adversarial module, such that the imputation nodes are impelled to align with the correct clusters. Afterwards, multiple subclusters are merged to guide the proposed edge attention network, which identifies the edge-wise attributes for each class, so as to avoid the redundant attributes in graph reconstruction from disturbing the refinement of overall embedding. To sum up, CGIR splits attribute-missing graph clustering into the search and mergence of subclusters, which guides to implement node imputation and refinement within a unified framework. Extensive experiments prove the advantages of CGIR over state-of-the-art competitors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.
Builds on
23 of 55 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
- 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 651
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentationcited by 519
- 2015Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 359
- 2020Structural Deep Clustering Networkcited by 145
- 2020Adaptive Graph Encoder for Attributed Graph Embeddingcited by 88
- 2022Hard Sample Aware Network for Contrastive Deep Graph Clusteringcited by 61
11 more
- 2020Learning on Attribute-Missing Graphscited by 42
- 2021Prototypical Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 37
- 2023Multi-View Graph Convolutional Network for Multimedia Recommendationcited by 32
- 2023Neighbor Contrastive Learning on Learnable Graph Augmentationcited by 25
- 2023DGCLUSTER: A Neural Framework for Attributed Graph Clustering via Modularity Maximizationcited by 21
- 2021Self-supervised Contrastive Attributed Graph Clusteringcited by 18
- 2022Accurate Node Feature Estimation with Structured Variational Graph Autoencodercited by 12
- 2024Reliable Node Similarity Matrix Guided Contrastive Graph Clusteringcited by 12
- 2022GraphMFT: A Graph Network based Multimodal Fusion Technique for Emotion Recognition in Conversationcited by 8
- 2024Deep Contrastive Graph Learning with Clustering-Oriented Guidancecited by 7
- 2023Revisiting Initializing Then Refining: An Incomplete and Missing Graph Imputation Networkcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.