mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

YOLO for Knowledge Extraction from Vehicle Images: A Baseline Study

arXiv 2507.18966 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate identification of vehicle attributes such as make, colour, and shape is critical for law enforcement and intelligence applications. This study evaluates the effectiveness of three state-of-the-art deep learning approaches YOLO-v11, YOLO-World, and YOLO-Classification on a real-world vehicle image dataset. This dataset was collected under challenging and unconstrained conditions by NSW Police Highway Patrol Vehicles. A multi-view inference (MVI) approach was deployed to enhance the performance of the models' predictions. To conduct the analyses, datasets with 100,000 plus images were created for each of the three metadata prediction tasks, specifically make, shape and colour. The models were tested on a separate dataset with 29,937 images belonging to 1809 number plates. Different sets of experiments have been investigated by varying the models sizes. A classification accuracy of 93.70%, 82.86%, 85.19%, and 94.86% was achieved with the best performing make, shape, colour, and colour-binary models respectively. It was concluded that there is a need to use MVI to get usable models within such complex real-world datasets. Our findings indicated that the object detection models YOLO-v11 and YOLO-World outperformed classification-only models in make and shape extraction. Moreover, smaller YOLO variants perform comparably to larger counterparts, offering substantial efficiency benefits for real-time predictions. This work provides a robust baseline for extracting vehicle metadata in real-world scenarios. Such models can be used in filtering and sorting user queries, minimising the time required to search large vehicle images datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.

Builds on

21 of 59 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  7. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  8. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  9. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  10. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
  11. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  12. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
9 more
  1. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,319
  2. 2019LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentationcited by 1,217
  3. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 540
  4. 2024YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 503
  5. 2021TransFG: A Transformer Architecture for Fine-grained Recognitioncited by 132
  6. 2015A Large-Scale Car Dataset for Fine-Grained Categorization and Verificationcited by 130
  7. 2019CityFlow: A City-Scale Benchmark for Multi-Target Multi-Camera Vehicle Tracking and Re-Identificationcited by 119
  8. 2019Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNscited by 90
  9. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning Toward a Real-time Vehicle Make and Model Recognitioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.