mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SIFOTL: A Principled, Statistically-Informed Fidelity-Optimization Method for Tabular Learning

arXiv 2507.17979 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying the factors driving data shifts in tabular datasets is a significant challenge for analysis and decision support systems, especially those focusing on healthcare. Privacy rules restrict data access, and noise from complex processes hinders analysis. To address this challenge, we propose SIFOTL (Statistically-Informed Fidelity-Optimization Method for Tabular Learning) that (i) extracts privacy-compliant data summary statistics, (ii) employs twin XGBoost models to disentangle intervention signals from noise with assistance from LLMs, and (iii) merges XGBoost outputs via a Pareto-weighted decision tree to identify interpretable segments responsible for the shift. Unlike existing analyses which may ignore noise or require full data access for LLM-based analysis, SIFOTL addresses both challenges using only privacy-safe summary statistics. Demonstrating its real-world efficacy, for a MEPS panel dataset mimicking a new Medicare drug subsidy, SIFOTL achieves an F1 score of 0.85, substantially outperforming BigQuery Contribution Analysis (F1=0.46) and statistical tests (F1=0.20) in identifying the segment receiving the subsidy. Furthermore, across 18 diverse EHR datasets generated based on Synthea ABM, SIFOTL sustains F1 scores of 0.86-0.96 without noise and >= 0.75 even with injected observational noise, whereas baseline average F1 scores range from 0.19-0.67 under the same tests. SIFOTL, therefore, provides an interpretable, privacy-conscious workflow that is empirically robust to observational noise.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2025.

Builds on

9 of 28 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  4. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 243
  5. 2018Statistical Aspects of Wasserstein Distancescited by 203
  6. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 153
  7. 2023Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineeringcited by 127
  8. 2024Optimized Feature Generation for Tabular Data via LLMs with Decision Tree Reasoningcited by 49
  9. 2019Tutorial: Safe and Reliable Machine Learningcited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.