mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessing Medical Training Skills via Eye and Head Movements

arXiv 2507.16819 ↗First posted 12 May 2025cs.HC cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We examined eye and head movements to gain insights into skill development in clinical settings. A total of 24 practitioners participated in simulated baby delivery training sessions. We calculated key metrics, including pupillary response rate, fixation duration, or angular velocity. Our findings indicate that eye and head tracking can effectively differentiate between trained and untrained practitioners, particularly during labor tasks. For example, head-related features achieved an F1 score of 0.85 and AUC of 0.86, whereas pupil-related features achieved F1 score of 0.77 and AUC of 0.85. The results lay the groundwork for computational models that support implicit skill assessment and training in clinical settings by using commodity eye-tracking glasses as a complementary device to more traditional evaluation methods such as subjective scores.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2025.

Builds on

2 of 65 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024Shifting Focus with HCEye: Exploring the Dynamics of Visual Highlighting and Cognitive Load on User Attention and Saliency Predictioncited by 6
  2. 2024On Task and in Sync: Examining the Relationship between Gaze Synchrony and Self-Reported Attention During Video Lecture Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.