mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Cost of Compression: Tight Quadratic Black-Box Attacks on Sketches for ℓ2 Norm Estimation

arXiv 2507.16345 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dimensionality reduction via linear sketching is a powerful and widely used technique, but it is known to be vulnerable to adversarial inputs. We study the black-box adversarial setting, where a fixed, hidden sketching matrix A ∈ Rk × n maps high-dimensional vectors v ∈ Rn to lower-dimensional sketches A v ∈ Rk, and an adversary can query the system to obtain approximate ℓ2-norm estimates that are computed from the sketch. We present a universal, nonadaptive attack that, using tildeO(k2) queries, either causes a failure in norm estimation or constructs an adversarial input on which the optimal estimator for the query distribution (used by the attack) fails. The attack is completely agnostic to the sketching matrix and to the estimator: it applies to any linear sketch and any query responder, including those that are randomized, adaptive, or tailored to the query distribution. Our lower bound construction tightly matches the known upper bounds of tildeOmega(k2), achieved by specialized estimators for Johnson Lindenstrauss transforms and AMS sketches. Beyond sketching, our results uncover structural parallels to adversarial attacks in image classification, highlighting fundamental vulnerabilities of compressed representations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  5. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 330
  6. 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 103
  7. 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
  8. 2014Preventing False Discovery in Interactive Data Analysis is Hardcited by 34
  9. 2020A Framework for Adversarially Robust Streaming Algorithmscited by 21
  10. 2020Adversarially Robust Streaming Algorithms via Differential Privacycited by 21
  11. 2021Dynamic Algorithms Against an Adaptive Adversary: Generic Constructions and Lower Boundscited by 17
  12. 2020Tight Bounds for Adversarially Robust Streams and Sliding Windows via Difference Estimatorscited by 16
13 more
  1. 2020On Adaptive Distance Estimationcited by 10
  2. 2021A Framework for Adversarial Streaming via Differential Privacy and Difference Estimatorscited by 9
  3. 2023Subsampling Suffices for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 9
  4. 2021Adversarially Robust Streaming via Dense--Sparse Trade-offscited by 7
  5. 2019Rounding Dynamic Matchings Against an Adaptive Adversarycited by 6
  6. 2022On the Robustness of CountSketch to Adaptive Inputscited by 5
  7. 2019Minimum Cut in O(mlog2 n) Timecited by 4
  8. 2020Decremental SSSP in Weighted Digraphs: Faster and Against an Adaptive Adversarycited by 3
  9. 2022Tricking the Hashing Trick: A Tight Lower Bound on the Robustness of CountSketch to Adaptive Inputscited by 2
  10. 2024Unmasking Vulnerabilities: Cardinality Sketches under Adaptive Inputscited by 1
  11. 2024A Strong Separation for Adversarially Robust ℓ0 Estimation for Linear Sketchescited by 1
  12. 2024One Attack to Rule Them All: Tight Quadratic Bounds for Adaptive Queries on Cardinality Sketchescited by 1
  13. 2025Lifting Linear Sketches: Optimal Bounds and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.