mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Out-of-Distribution Generalization in the ARC-AGI Domain: Comparing Execution-Guided Neural Program Synthesis and Test-Time Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2507.15877 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2025cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We run a controlled compositional generalization experiment in the ARC-AGI domain: an open-world problem domain in which the ability to generalize out-of-distribution is, by design, an essential characteristic for success. We compare neural program synthesis and test-time fine-tuning approaches on this experiment. We find that execution-guided neural program synthesis outperforms all reference algorithms in its ability to compose novel solutions. Our empirical findings also suggest that the success of TTFT on ARC-AGI lies mainly in eliciting in-distribution knowledge that the LLM otherwise fails to rely on directly.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2025.

Builds on

6 of 33 references.

References · 6

  1. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
  2. 2019Write, Execute, Assess: Program Synthesis with a REPLcited by 93
  3. 2023ExeDec: Execution Decomposition for Compositional Generalization in Neural Program Synthesiscited by 17
  4. 2024Towards Efficient Neurally-Guided Program Induction for ARC-AGIcited by 11
  5. 2025Execution Guided Line-by-Line Code Generationcited by 10
  6. 2024Is Large-Scale Pretraining the Secret to Good Domain Generalization?cited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.