mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A DPI-PAC-Bayesian Framework for Generalization Bounds

arXiv 2507.14795 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2025cs.IT math.IT stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We develop a unified Data Processing Inequality PAC-Bayesian framework -- abbreviated DPI-PAC-Bayesian -- for deriving generalization error bounds in the supervised learning setting. By embedding the Data Processing Inequality (DPI) into the change-of-measure technique, we obtain explicit bounds on the binary Kullback-Leibler generalization gap for both R'enyi divergence and any f-divergence measured between a data-independent prior distribution and an algorithm-dependent posterior distribution. We present three bounds derived under our framework using R'enyi, Hellinger (p) and Chi-Squared divergences. Additionally, our framework also demonstrates a close connection with other well-known bounds. When the prior distribution is chosen to be uniform, our bounds recover the classical Occam's Razor bound and, crucially, eliminate the extraneous (log(2√n)/n) slack present in the PAC-Bayes bound, thereby achieving tighter results. The framework thus bridges data-processing and PAC-Bayesian perspectives, providing a flexible, information-theoretic tool to construct generalization guarantees.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2025.

Builds on

3 of 24 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 239
  2. 2019Generalization Error Bounds Via R'enyi-, f-Divergences and Maximal Leakagecited by 48
  3. 2021How Tight Can PAC-Bayes be in the Small Data Regime?cited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.