mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LeanTree: Accelerating White-Box Proof Search with Factorized States in Lean 4

arXiv 2507.14722 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated theorem proving (ATP) has been a classical problem in artificial intelligence since its inception, yet it remains challenging due to its vast state and action space. Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a promising heuristic for ATP, but they lack correctness guarantees and thus require interaction with a proof verifier. Such interactions typically follow one of two approaches: black-box interaction, which does not utilize intermediate proof states, or white-box approaches, which allow for incremental proof construction and examination of intermediate states. While black-box approaches have directly benefited from recent LLM advances, white-box methods have comparatively lagged behind. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing LeanTree, which consists of (i) a tool built in the Lean 4 language that factorizes complex proof states into simpler, independent branches, and (ii) a dataset of these factorized intermediate states. Our white-box tooling offers several advantages over black-box approaches: it simplifies evaluation, reduces necessary context, generates richer training data, enables parallel search across multiple states, supports efficient reuse of states, and provides feedback in case of errors. Our preliminary results hint that white-box approaches outperform black-box alternatives in some settings.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2025.

Builds on

22 of 40 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
  2. 2023Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematicscited by 385
  3. 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 380
  4. 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
  5. 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 270
  6. 2024DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Datacited by 225
  7. 2022HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Provingcited by 192
  8. 2024DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Searchcited by 189
  9. 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
  10. 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 153
  11. 2021Proof Artifact Co-training for Theorem Proving with Language Modelscited by 130
  12. 2019The Lean mathematical librarycited by 127
10 more
  1. 2024InternLM-Math: Open Math Large Language Models Toward Verifiable Reasoningcited by 117
  2. 2024Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problemscited by 115
  3. 2016Holophrasm: a neural Automated Theorem Prover for higher-order logiccited by 29
  4. 2024LeanReasoner: Boosting Complex Logical Reasoning with Leancited by 28
  5. 2024Pantograph: A Machine-to-Machine Interaction Interface for Advanced Theorem Proving, High Level Reasoning, and Data Extraction in Lean 4cited by 15
  6. 2018Axiomatic Foundations and Algorithms for Deciding Semantic Equivalences of SQL Queriescited by 11
  7. 2022Formalizing Chemical Physics using the Lean Theorem Provercited by 9
  8. 2022Formalising the h-principle and sphere eversioncited by 6
  9. 2024Formalization of physics index notation in Lean 4cited by 3
  10. 2025A Proof-Producing Compiler for Blockchain Applicationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.