mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Graph Contrastive Learning on Anomaly Detection: A Structural Imbalance Perspective

arXiv 2507.14677 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2025cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The superiority of graph contrastive learning (GCL) has prompted its application to anomaly detection tasks for more powerful risk warning systems. Unfortunately, existing GCL-based models tend to excessively prioritize overall detection performance while neglecting robustness to structural imbalance, which can be problematic for many real-world networks following power-law degree distributions. Particularly, GCL-based methods may fail to capture tail anomalies (abnormal nodes with low degrees). This raises concerns about the security and robustness of current anomaly detection algorithms and therefore hinders their applicability in a variety of realistic high-risk scenarios. To the best of our knowledge, research on the robustness of graph anomaly detection to structural imbalance has received little scrutiny. To address the above issues, this paper presents a novel GCL-based framework named AD-GCL. It devises the neighbor pruning strategy to filter noisy edges for head nodes and facilitate the detection of genuine tail nodes by aligning from head nodes to forged tail nodes. Moreover, AD-GCL actively explores potential neighbors to enlarge the receptive field of tail nodes through anomaly-guided neighbor completion. We further introduce intra- and inter-view consistency loss of the original and augmentation graph for enhanced representation. The performance evaluation of the whole, head, and tail nodes on multiple datasets validates the comprehensive superiority of the proposed AD-GCL in detecting both head anomalies and tail anomalies.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2025.

Builds on

20 of 50 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  5. 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
  6. 2023A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?cited by 332
  7. 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 248
  8. 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection with Deep Learningcited by 230
  9. 2020Graph Information Bottleneckcited by 168
  10. 2022BOND: Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Node Detection on Static Attributed Graphscited by 80
  11. 2019DEMO-Net: Degree-specific Graph Neural Networks for Node and Graph Classificationcited by 59
  12. 2023GADBench: Revisiting and Benchmarking Supervised Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 57
8 more
  1. 2022Graph Anomaly Detection via Multi-Scale Contrastive Learning Networks with Augmented Viewcited by 54
  2. 2023GAD-NR: Graph Anomaly Detection via Neighborhood Reconstructioncited by 44
  3. 2022Reconstruction Enhanced Multi-View Contrastive Learning for Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networkscited by 28
  4. 2022ImGCL: Revisiting Graph Contrastive Learning on Imbalanced Node Classificationcited by 21
  5. 2022A Survey of Graph-based Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Distributed Systemscited by 20
  6. 2024CLDG: Contrastive Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 11
  7. 2023SAILOR: Structural Augmentation Based Tail Node Representation Learningcited by 6
  8. 2021FENet: A Frequency Extraction Network for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.