mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards a Proactive Autoscaling Framework for Data Stream Processing at the Edge using GRU and Transfer Learning

arXiv 2507.14597 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2025cs.DC cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Processing data at high speeds is becoming increasingly critical as digital economies generate enormous data. The current paradigms for timely data processing are edge computing and data stream processing (DSP). Edge computing places resources closer to where data is generated, while stream processing analyzes the unbounded high-speed data in motion. However, edge stream processing faces rapid workload fluctuations, complicating resource provisioning. Inadequate resource allocation leads to bottlenecks, whereas excess allocation results in wastage. Existing reactive methods, such as threshold-based policies and queuing theory scale only after performance degrades, potentially violating SLAs. Although reinforcement learning (RL) offers a proactive approach through agents that learn optimal runtime adaptation policies, it requires extensive simulation. Furthermore, predictive machine learning models face online distribution and concept drift that minimize their accuracy. We propose a three-step solution to the proactive edge stream processing autoscaling problem. Firstly, a GRU neural network forecasts the upstream load using real-world and synthetic DSP datasets. Secondly, a transfer learning framework integrates the predictive model into an online stream processing system using the DTW algorithm and joint distribution adaptation to handle the disparities between offline and online domains. Finally, a horizontal autoscaling module dynamically adjusts the degree of operator parallelism, based on predicted load while considering edge resource constraints. The lightweight GRU model for load predictions recorded up to 1.3% SMAPE value on a real-world data set. It outperformed CNN, ARIMA, and Prophet on the SMAPE and RMSE evaluation metrics, with lower training time than the computationally intensive RL models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2025.

Builds on

4 of 55 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Generalization in the Presence of Distribution and Missingness Shiftcited by 11
  2. 2019Multi-Source Transfer Learning for Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 9
  3. 2021Evaluation of Load Prediction Techniques for Distributed Stream Processingcited by 1
  4. 2025Learning from the Past: Adaptive Parallelism Tuning for Stream Processing Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Multi-Dimensional Autoscaling of Stream Processing Services on Edge Devices
  2. 2025Percepta: High Performance Stream Processing at the Edge
  3. 2026Learning to Remember: Attentive Reinforcement Learning for Edge Serverless Autoscaling
  4. 2025A Hybrid Proactive And Predictive Framework For Edge Cloud Resource Management
  5. 2024To Train or Not to Train: Balancing Efficiency and Training Cost in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Mobile Edge Computing
  6. 2024Accelerating AIGC Services with Latent Action Diffusion Scheduling in Edge Networks
  7. 2024Graph Neural Networks and Reinforcement Learning for Proactive Application Image Placement
  8. 2025Agile Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time Task Scheduling in Edge Computing