Large Language Models Assisting Ontology Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ontology evaluation through functional requirements, such as testing via competency question (CQ) verification, is a well-established yet costly, labour-intensive, and error-prone endeavour, even for ontology engineering experts. In this work, we introduce OE-Assist, a novel framework designed to assist ontology evaluation through automated and semi-automated CQ verification. By presenting and leveraging a dataset of 1,393 CQs paired with corresponding ontologies and ontology stories, our contributions present, to our knowledge, the first systematic investigation into large language model (LLM)-assisted ontology evaluation, and include: (i) evaluating the effectiveness of a LLM-based approach for automatically performing CQ verification against a manually created gold standard, and (ii) developing and assessing an LLM-powered framework to assist CQ verification with Prot'eg'e, by providing suggestions. We found that automated LLM-based evaluation with o1-preview and o3-mini perform at a similar level to the average user's performance.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2025.
Builds on
8 of 34 references.
References · 8
- 2025Ontology Generation using Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2019ArCo: the Italian Cultural Heritage Knowledge Graphcited by 20
- 2024OntoChat: a Framework for Conversational Ontology Engineering using Language Modelscited by 15
- 2023An Experiment in Retrofitting Competency Questions for Existing Ontologiescited by 12
- 2025Assessing the Capability of Large Language Models for Domain-Specific Ontology Generationcited by 7
- 2023The Water Health Open Knowledge Graphcited by 5
- 2024Toward a Method to Generate Capability Ontologies from Natural Language Descriptionscited by 4
- 2024My Ontologist: Evaluating BFO-Based AI for Definition Supportcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.