LIMINAL: Exploring The Frontiers of LLM Decode Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitates a deep understanding of their fundamental performance limits. This paper investigates the limits of LLM inference, focusing on hardware-imposed bottlenecks in auto-regressive decoding. We develop LIMINAL, an analytical performance model that abstracts application requirements and hardware capabilities to systematically explore performance and efficiency across a wide range of current, near-future, and hypothetical hardware. We find LIMINAL is accurate when comparing to LLMs executing on existing hardware, achieving a mean absolute error of 7.6%. Our analysis spans from current HBM3 memory technology used in AI accelerators like GPUs and TPUs to systems based on advanced HBM4 and advanced 3D-stacked DRAM technology. We identify five non-negotiable challenges for LLM inference hardware, establishing compute, memory capacity, bandwidth and collective communication as primary barriers to performance. These findings suggest that achieving significant performance gains beyond 10,000 tokens-per-second will require not just hardware evolution but also fundamental algorithmic advances.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 10.
11 papers.
- 2026How Fast Can I Run My VLA? Demystifying VLA Inference Performance with VLA-Perfcited by 19
- 2026Computer Architecture's AlphaZero Moment: Automated Discovery in an Encircled Worldcited by 5
- 2026TriAxialKV: Toward Extreme Low-Precision KV-Cache Quantization for Agentic Inference Taskscited by 3
- 2025Adaptive and Resource-efficient Agentic AI Systems for Mobile and Embedded Devices: A Surveycited by 2
- 2026TaxBreak: Unmasking the Hidden Costs of LLM Inference Through Overhead Decompositioncited by 2
- 2026TIDE: Temporal Incremental Draft Engine for Self-Improving LLM Inferencecited by 1
- 2026Architecture-Aware LLM Inference Optimization on AMD Instinct GPUs: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Deployment Studycited by 0
- 2026Think Before You Grid-Search: Floor-First Triage for LLM Servingcited by 0
- 2026GGUF-Metadata Prediction of Single-Sequence llama.cpp Throughput Across Three Systemscited by 0
- 2026More Value per Key: Asymmetric Sparse Attention for Faster LLM Decodingcited by 0
- 2026FORGE: Procedural Weight Generation for Sparse MoE Inferencecited by 0
- 2026FORGE: Procedural Weight Generation for Sparse MoE Inference12 Oct 2026
- 2026More Value per Key: Asymmetric Sparse Attention for Faster LLM Decoding3 Oct 2026
- 2026GGUF-Metadata Prediction of Single-Sequence llama.cpp Throughput Across Three Systems14 Sep 2026
- 2026Think Before You Grid-Search: Floor-First Triage for LLM Serving7 Jul 2026
- 2026TriAxialKV: Toward Extreme Low-Precision KV-Cache Quantization for Agentic Inference Tasks16 May 2026
- 2026Computer Architecture's AlphaZero Moment: Automated Discovery in an Encircled World31 Mar 2026
- 2026TaxBreak: Unmasking the Hidden Costs of LLM Inference Through Overhead Decomposition12 Mar 2026
- 2026Architecture-Aware LLM Inference Optimization on AMD Instinct GPUs: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Deployment Study27 Feb 2026
- 2026How Fast Can I Run My VLA? Demystifying VLA Inference Performance with VLA-Perf20 Feb 2026
- 2026TIDE: Temporal Incremental Draft Engine for Self-Improving LLM Inference5 Feb 2026
- 2025Adaptive and Resource-efficient Agentic AI Systems for Mobile and Embedded Devices: A Survey30 Sep 2025