Retention analysis of edited knowledge after fine-tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) store vast amounts of knowledge, which often requires updates to correct factual errors, incorporate newly acquired information, or adapt model behavior. Model editing methods have emerged as efficient solutions for such updates, offering localized and precise knowledge modification at significantly lower computational cost than continual training. In parallel, LLMs are frequently fine-tuned for a wide range of downstream tasks. However, the effect of fine-tuning on previously edited knowledge remains poorly understood. In this work, we systematically investigate how different fine-tuning objectives interact with various model editing techniques. Our findings show that edited knowledge is substantially more susceptible to forgetting during fine-tuning than intrinsic knowledge acquired through pre-training. This analysis highlights a key limitation of current editing approaches and suggests that evaluating edit robustness under downstream fine-tuning is critical for their practical deployment. We further find that knowledge retention can be significantly improved by either augmenting edit knowledge with paraphrases or by freezing layers associated with edited content in fine-tuning stage, offering insight for developing more robust editing algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.
Builds on
24 of 27 references.
References · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
- 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 601
- 2021Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 553
- 2021Fast Model Editing at Scalecited by 498
- 2022Memory-Based Model Editing at Scalecited by 447
- 2023Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 372
- 2023MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questionscited by 300
12 more
- 2023Can We Edit Factual Knowledge by In-Context Learning?cited by 285
- 2022Aging with GRACE: Lifelong Model Editing with Discrete Key-Value Adaptorscited by 271
- 2023Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 243
- 2023Evaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 242
- 2024AlphaEdit: Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing for Language Modelscited by 236
- 2021Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 230
- 2024Model Editing Harms General Abilities of Large Language Models: Regularization to the Rescuecited by 103
- 2024Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 93
- 2023Massive Editing for Large Language Models via Meta Learningcited by 63
- 2024Language Models Resist Alignment: Evidence From Data Compressioncited by 53
- 2024Can Knowledge Editing Really Correct Hallucinations?cited by 28
- 2024Model Editing by Standard Fine-Tuningcited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Fine Until Fine-Tuned: Repeated Solutions Make Reasoning Fragile27 Sep 2026
- 2026Intrinsic-Extrinsic Coupling in Learning Dynamics24 Sep 2026