mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

COREVQA: A Crowd Observation and Reasoning Entailment Visual Question Answering Benchmark

arXiv 2507.13405 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, many benchmarks and datasets have been developed to evaluate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) using visual question answering (VQA) pairs, and models have shown significant accuracy improvements. However, these benchmarks rarely test the model's ability to accurately complete visual entailment, for instance, accepting or refuting a hypothesis based on the image. To address this, we propose COREVQA (Crowd Observations and Reasoning Entailment), a benchmark of 5608 image and synthetically generated true/false statement pairs, with images derived from the CrowdHuman dataset, to provoke visual entailment reasoning on challenging crowded images. Our results show that even the top-performing VLMs achieve accuracy below 80%, with other models performing substantially worse (39.98%-69.95%). This significant performance gap reveals key limitations in VLMs' ability to reason over certain types of image-question pairs in crowded scenes.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2025.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024NTSEBENCH: Cognitive Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models15 Jul

Other references · 16

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  3. 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,239
  4. 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 940
  5. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  6. 2025Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scalingcited by 812
  7. 2018CrowdHuman: A Benchmark for Detecting Human in a Crowdcited by 284
  8. 2019Visual Entailment: A Novel Task for Fine-Grained Image Understandingcited by 252
  9. 2024MMT-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models Towards Multitask AGIcited by 193
  10. 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 135
  11. 2024NaturalBench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Natural Adversarial Samplescited by 97
  12. 2024MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMscited by 72
4 more
  1. 2024Artifacts or Abduction: How Do LLMs Answer Multiple-Choice Questions Without the Question?cited by 71
  2. 2025A Survey of State of the Art Large Vision Language Models: Alignment, Benchmark, Evaluations and Challengescited by 47
  3. 2024M3GIA: A Cognition Inspired Multilingual and Multimodal General Intelligence Ability Benchmarkcited by 14
  4. 2025VLDBench Evaluating Multimodal Disinformation with Regulatory Alignmentcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledge
  2. 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Visual Question Answering Datasets and Algorithms
  3. 2025VisualOverload: Probing Visual Understanding of VLMs in Really Dense Scenes
  4. 2025Exploring Advanced Techniques for Visual Question Answering: A Comprehensive Comparison
  5. 2024Natural Language Understanding and Inference with MLLM in Visual Question Answering: A Survey
  6. 2025ReasonVQA: A Multi-hop Reasoning Benchmark with Structural Knowledge for Visual Question Answering
  7. 2025Commonsense Video Question Answering through Video-Grounded Entailment Tree Reasoning
  8. 2024DARE: Diverse Visual Question Answering with Robustness Evaluation