mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RONOM: Reduced-Order Neural Operator Modeling

arXiv 2507.12814 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.CE cs.NAcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time-dependent partial differential equations are ubiquitous in physics-based modeling, but they remain computationally intensive in many-query scenarios, such as real-time forecasting, optimal control, and uncertainty quantification. Reduced-order modeling (ROM) addresses these challenges by constructing a low-dimensional surrogate model but relies on a fixed discretization, which limits flexibility across varying meshes during evaluation. Operator learning approaches, such as neural operators, offer an alternative by parameterizing mappings between infinite-dimensional function spaces, enabling adaptation to data across different resolutions. Whereas ROM provides rigorous numerical error estimates, neural operator learning largely focuses on discretization convergence and invariance without quantifying the error between the infinite-dimensional and the discretized operators. This work introduces the reduced-order neural operator modeling (RONOM) framework, which bridges concepts from ROM and operator learning. We establish a discretization error bound analogous to those in ROM, and get insights into RONOM's discretization convergence and discretization robustness. Moreover, three numerical examples are presented that compare RONOM to existing neural operators for solving partial differential equations. The results demonstrate that RONOM using standard vector-to-vector neural networks can achieve comparable performance in input generalization and achieves superior performance in both spatial super-resolution and discretization robustness, while also offering novel insights into temporal super-resolution scenarios and ROM-based approaches for learning on time-dependent data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2025.

Builds on

23 of 49 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  3. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
  4. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
  5. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 427
  6. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 303
  7. 2020Model Reduction and Neural Networks for Parametric PDEscited by 258
  8. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 214
  9. 2014Dynamic mode decomposition with controlcited by 129
  10. 2020The Random Feature Model for Input-Output Maps between Banach Spacescited by 90
  11. 2022NOMAD: Nonlinear Manifold Decoders for Operator Learningcited by 83
  12. 2021POD-DL-ROM: enhancing deep learning-based reduced order models for nonlinear parametrized PDEs by proper orthogonal decompositioncited by 79
11 more
  1. 2023A Mathematical Guide to Operator Learningcited by 76
  2. 2022Continuous PDE Dynamics Forecasting with Implicit Neural Representationscited by 73
  3. 2023Representation Equivalent Neural Operators: a Framework for Alias-free Operator Learningcited by 57
  4. 2022Neural Galerkin Schemes with Active Learning for High-Dimensional Evolution Equationscited by 56
  5. 2023Kernel Methods are Competitive for Operator Learningcited by 50
  6. 2024Discretization Error of Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 22
  7. 2025Neural Chaos: A Spectral Stochastic Neural Operatorcited by 21
  8. 2024On latent dynamics learning in nonlinear reduced order modelingcited by 14
  9. 2023RDA-INR: Riemannian Diffeomorphic Autoencoding via Implicit Neural Representationscited by 7
  10. 2021Uncertainty quantification of a three-dimensional in-stent restenosis model with surrogate modellingcited by 6
  11. 2025Joint Manifold Learning and Optimal Transport for Dynamic Imagingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.