mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MERA Code: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Code Generation Across Tasks

arXiv 2507.12284 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Advancements in LLMs have enhanced task automation in software engineering; however, current evaluations primarily focus on natural language tasks, overlooking code quality. Most benchmarks prioritize high-level reasoning over executable code and real-world performance, leaving gaps in understanding true capabilities and risks associated with these models in production. To address this issue, we propose MERA Code, a new addition to the MERA benchmark family, specifically focused on evaluating code for the latest code generation LLMs in Russian. This benchmark includes 11 evaluation tasks that span 8 programming languages. Our proposed evaluation methodology features a taxonomy that outlines the practical coding skills necessary for models to complete these tasks. The benchmark comprises an open-source codebase for users to conduct MERA assessments, a scoring system compatible with various programming environments, and a platform featuring a leaderboard and submission system. We evaluate open LLMs and frontier API models, analyzing their limitations in terms of practical coding tasks in non-English languages. We are publicly releasing MERA to guide future research, anticipate groundbreaking features in model development, and standardize evaluation procedures.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.

Builds on

26 of 37 references.

References · 26

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  4. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  5. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  6. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  7. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  8. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
  9. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
  10. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 658
  11. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
  12. 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 479
14 more
  1. 2023RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systemscited by 353
  2. 2024DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligencecited by 331
  3. 2023ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generationcited by 168
  4. 2023TACO: Topics in Algorithmic COde generation datasetcited by 160
  5. 2022Multi-lingual Evaluation of Code Generation Modelscited by 159
  6. 2020Unit Test Case Generation with Transformers and Focal Contextcited by 118
  7. 2023CodeScore: Evaluating Code Generation by Learning Code Executioncited by 67
  8. 2023Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Codecited by 62
  9. 2024MERA: A Comprehensive LLM Evaluation in Russiancited by 22
  10. 2025Correctness Assessment of Code Generated by Large Language Models Using Internal Representationscited by 17
  11. 2024Facilitating large language model Russian adaptation with Learned Embedding Propagationcited by 8
  12. 2025GigaChat Family: Efficient Russian Language Modeling Through Mixture of Experts Architecturecited by 8
  13. 2025YABLoCo: Yet Another Benchmark for Long Context Code Generationcited by 5
  14. 2025StRuCom: A Novel Dataset of Structured Code Comments in Russiancited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.