Hybrid Ensemble Approaches: Optimal Deep Feature Fusion and Hyperparameter-Tuned Classifier Ensembling for Enhanced Brain Tumor Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is widely recognized as the most reliable tool for detecting tumors due to its capability to produce detailed images that reveal their presence. However, the accuracy of diagnosis can be compromised when human specialists evaluate these images. Factors such as fatigue, limited expertise, and insufficient image detail can lead to errors. For example, small tumors might go unnoticed, or overlap with healthy brain regions could result in misidentification. To address these challenges and enhance diagnostic precision, this study proposes a novel double ensembling framework, consisting of ensembled pre-trained deep learning (DL) models for feature extraction and ensembled fine-tuned hyperparameter machine learning (ML) models to efficiently classify brain tumors. Specifically, our method includes extensive preprocessing and augmentation, transfer learning concepts by utilizing various pre-trained deep convolutional neural networks and vision transformer networks to extract deep features from brain MRI, and fine-tune hyperparameters of ML classifiers. Our experiments utilized three different publicly available Kaggle MRI brain tumor datasets to evaluate the pre-trained DL feature extractor models, ML classifiers, and the effectiveness of an ensemble of deep features along with an ensemble of ML classifiers for brain tumor classification. Our results indicate that the proposed feature fusion and classifier fusion improve upon the state of the art, with hyperparameter fine-tuning providing a significant enhancement over the ensemble method. Additionally, we present an ablation study to illustrate how each component contributes to accurate brain tumor classification.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.
Builds on
20 of 58 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 943
- 2015An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 514
- 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 370
- 2020Visual Transformers: Token-based Image Representation and Processing for Computer Visioncited by 334
- 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
8 more
- 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 221
- 2020Hyper-Parameter Optimization: A Review of Algorithms and Applicationscited by 114
- 2022Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 96
- 2018Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classificationcited by 57
- 2019Learning Activation Functions: A new paradigm for understanding Neural Networkscited by 34
- 2015Hyperparameter Search in Machine Learningcited by 33
- 2024A Deep Learning Approach for Brain Tumor Classification and Segmentation Using a Multiscale Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 7
- 2019Predictive modeling of brain tumor: A Deep learning approachcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.