Emergence of Quantised Representations Isolated to Anisotropic Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Presented is a novel methodology for determining representational structure, which builds upon the existing Spotlight Resonance method. This new tool is used to gain insight into how discrete representations can emerge and organise in autoencoder models, through a controlled ablation study that alters only the activation function. Using this technique, the validity of whether function-driven symmetries can act as implicit inductive biases on representations is determined. Representations are found to tend to discretise when the activation functions are defined through a discrete algebraic permutation-equivariant symmetry. In contrast, they remain continuous under a continuous algebraic orthogonal-equivariant definition. This confirms the hypothesis that the symmetries of network primitives can carry unintended inductive biases, leading to task-independent artefactual structures in representations. The discrete symmetry of contemporary forms is shown to be a strong predictor for the production of symmetry-organised discrete representations emerging from otherwise continuous distributions -- a quantisation effect. This motivates further reassessment of functional forms in common usage due to such unintended consequences. Moreover, this supports a general causal model for a mode in which discrete representations may form, and could constitute a prerequisite for downstream interpretability phenomena, including grandmother neurons, discrete coding schemes, general linear features and a type of Superposition. Hence, this tool and proposed mechanism for the influence of functional form on representations may provide insights into interpretability research. Finally, preliminary results indicate that quantisation of representations correlates with a measurable increase in reconstruction error, reinforcing previous conjectures that this collapse can be detrimental.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.
Builds on
13 of 30 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
- 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
- 2022On the Symmetries of Deep Learning Models and their Internal Representationscited by 64
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Improving Equivariant Networks with Probabilistic Symmetry Breaking
- 2022Learning Symmetric Embeddings for Equivariant World Models
- 2025Equivariant Sparse Autoencoders: Mechanistic Interpretability of Neural Networks on Symmetric Data
- 2025Few-shot Implicit Function Generation via Equivariance
- 2023Disentanglement via Latent Quantization
- 2025Latent Mixture of Symmetries for Sample-Efficient Dynamic Learning
- 2024Group Crosscoders for Mechanistic Analysis of Symmetry
- 2025The Non-Linear Representation Dilemma: Is Causal Abstraction Enough for Mechanistic Interpretability?