Scaling laws for activation steering with Llama 2 models and refusal mechanisms
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Activation steering methods
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) evolve in complexity and capability, the efficacy of less widely deployed alignment techniques are uncertain. Building on previous work on activation steering and contrastive activation addition (CAA), this paper explores the effectiveness of CAA with model scale using the family of Llama 2 models (7B, 13B, and 70B). CAA works by finding desirable 'directions' in the model's residual stream vector space using contrastive pairs (for example, hate to love) and adding this direction to the residual stream during the forward pass. It directly manipulates the residual stream and aims to extract features from language models to better control their outputs. Using answer matching questions centered around the refusal behavior, we found that 1) CAA is most effective when applied at early-mid layers. 2) The effectiveness of CAA diminishes with model size. 3) Negative steering has more pronounced effects than positive steering across all model sizes.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Activation steering methods, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 12 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.
Builds on
12 of 15 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 11
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
- 2024Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A Surveycited by 283
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
- 2023A Toy Model of Universality: Reverse Engineering How Networks Learn Group Operationscited by 144
- 2022ModelDiff: A Framework for Comparing Learning Algorithmscited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Endogenous Resistance to Activation Steering in Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026When Is a Steerable Concept Representation Real? Measurement Confounds in a Cross-Family Audit of Neuroscience Parallels in LLMscited by 2
- 2026Toward Latent Language Model Skills Steering and Optimization: An Empirical Studycited by 0
- 2026Toward Latent Language Model Skills Steering and Optimization: An Empirical Study29 Aug 2026
- 2026When Is a Steerable Concept Representation Real? Measurement Confounds in a Cross-Family Audit of Neuroscience Parallels in LLMs8 Aug 2026
- 2026Endogenous Resistance to Activation Steering in Language Models6 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Patterns and Mechanisms of Contrastive Activation Engineering
- 2026Does Steering Break Your Model? A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Suite for LLM Steering Methods
- 2025Interpretable Steering of Large Language Models with Feature Guided Activation Additions
- 2026What Drives Representation Steering? A Mechanistic Case Study on Steering Refusal
- 2025Steering Language Models with Weight Arithmetic
- 2026On the Non-Identifiability of Steering Vectors in Large Language Models
- 2025Steering When Necessary: Flexible Steering Large Language Models with Backtracking
- 2026Where to Steer: Input-Dependent Layer Selection for Steering Improves LLM Alignment