Recurrent U-Net-Based Graph Neural Network (RUGNN) for Accurate Deformation Predictions in Sheet Material Forming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, various artificial intelligence-based surrogate models have been proposed to provide rapid manufacturability predictions of material forming processes. However, traditional AI-based surrogate models, typically built with scalar or image-based neural networks, are limited in their ability to capture complex 3D spatial relationships and to operate in a permutation-invariant manner. To overcome these issues, emerging graph-based surrogate models are developed using graph neural networks. This study developed a new graph neural network surrogate model named Recurrent U Net-based Graph Neural Network (RUGNN). The RUGNN model can achieve accurate predictions of sheet material deformation fields across multiple forming timesteps. The RUGNN model incorporates Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) to model temporal dynamics and a U-Net inspired graph-based downsample/upsample mechanism to handle spatial long-range dependencies. A novel 'node-to-surface' contact representation method was proposed, offering significant improvements in computational efficiency for large-scale contact interactions. The RUGNN model was validated using a cold forming case study and a more complex hot forming case study using aluminium alloys. Results demonstrate that the RUGNN model provides accurate deformation predictions closely matching ground truth FE simulations and outperforming several baseline GNN architectures. Model tuning was also performed to identify suitable hyperparameters, training strategies, and input feature representations. These results demonstrate that RUGNN is a reliable approach to support sheet material forming design by enabling accurate manufacturability predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.
Builds on
21 of 45 references.
References · 21
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
- 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
- 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 868
- 2018Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and controlcited by 244
- 2021Physics-informed graph neural Galerkin networks: A unified framework for solving PDE-governed forward and inverse problemscited by 102
- 2022MultiScale MeshGraphNetscited by 98
- 2023Everything is Connected: Graph Neural Networkscited by 85
- 2022Learning rigid dynamics with face interaction graph networkscited by 43
- 2022MAgNET: A Graph U-Net Architecture for Mesh-Based Simulationscited by 26
- 2023Deep Learning in Deterministic Computational Mechanicscited by 21
- 2019ST-UNet: A Spatio-Temporal U-Network for Graph-structured Time Series Modelingcited by 19
9 more
- 2024Geometric Deep Learning for Computer-Aided Design: A Surveycited by 14
- 2024A review of graph neural network applications in mechanics-related domainscited by 14
- 2024Learning rigid-body simulators over implicit shapes for large-scale scenes and visioncited by 12
- 2022Towards Fast Simulation of Environmental Fluid Mechanics with Multi-Scale Graph Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2022On the use of graph neural networks and shape-function-based gradient computation in the deep energy methodcited by 10
- 2022A Review of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Structural Dynamics and Vibroacousticcited by 7
- 2024Physics-Encoded Graph Neural Networks for Deformation Prediction under Contactcited by 6
- 2020A study on using image based machine learning methods to develop the surrogate models of stamp forming simulationscited by 5
- 2021Rapid feasibility assessment of components formed through hot stamping: A deep learning approachcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.