DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has heightened concerns about benchmark data contamination (BDC), where models inadvertently memorize evaluation data during the training process, inflating performance metrics, and undermining genuine generalization assessment. This paper introduces the Data Contamination Risk (DCR) framework, a lightweight, interpretable pipeline designed to detect and quantify BDC risk across four granular levels: semantic, informational, data, and label. By synthesizing contamination scores via a fuzzy inference system, DCR produces a unified DCR Factor that adjusts raw accuracy to reflect contamination-aware performance. Validated on 9 LLMs (0.5B-72B) across sentiment analysis, fake news detection, and arithmetic reasoning tasks, the DCR framework reliably diagnoses contamination severity and with accuracy adjusted using the DCR Factor to within 4% average error across the three benchmarks compared to the uncontaminated baseline. Emphasizing computational efficiency and transparency, DCR provides a practical tool for integrating contamination assessment into routine evaluations, fostering fairer comparisons and enhancing the credibility of LLM benchmarking practices.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.
Builds on
32 of 56 references.
References · 32
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
- 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 314
- 2024MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extractioncited by 267
- 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 264
- 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 236
20 more
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
- 2023Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samplescited by 195
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2023Large-scale Multi-Modal Pre-trained Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 153
- 2024Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 147
- 2023Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4cited by 125
- 2025Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judgecited by 125
- 2022Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacycited by 100
- 2023Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot Anymorecited by 99
- 2024Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 91
- 2024DE-COP: Detecting Copyrighted Content in Language Models Training Datacited by 74
- 2024Quantifying Contamination in Evaluating Code Generation Capabilities of Language Modelscited by 65
- 2024Instruction Pre-Training: Language Models are Supervised Multitask Learnerscited by 63
- 2023Estimating Contamination via Perplexity: Quantifying Memorisation in Language Model Evaluationcited by 48
- 2024Can Perplexity Reflect Large Language Model's Ability in Long Text Understanding?cited by 45
- 2023Data Contamination Through the Lens of Timecited by 40
- 2024Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Models: A Survey from Detection to Remediationcited by 30
- 2024Data Contamination Calibration for Black-box LLMscited by 24
- 2025The Emperor's New Clothes in Benchmarking? A Rigorous Examination of Mitigation Strategies for LLM Benchmark Data Contaminationcited by 15
- 2024How Much Can We Forget about Data Contamination?cited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 10.
10 papers.
- 2026Do Instruction-Tuned Models Always Perform Better Than Base Models? Evidence from Math and Domain-Shifted Benchmarkscited by 4
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releasescited by 3
- 2026LiveFact: A Dynamic, Time-Aware Benchmark for LLM-Driven Fake News Detectioncited by 2
- 2026Phantom Gains: Auditing Self-Improvement Against a Measured Nullcited by 2
- 2026Do Assessment Instruments Measure the Same Thing for Humans and LLMs? A Latent Structure Analysiscited by 1
- 2026Summarization is Not Dead Yetcited by 0
- 2026StatABench: Dataset and Framework for Evaluating Statistical Analysis Capabilities of LLMscited by 0
- 2026Interpretable Humans, Alien LLMs: Expert Analysis of Latent Structures in Assessment Responsescited by 0
- 2026Learning to Zoom Efficiently with a Contrastive Curriculumcited by 0
- 2026Uncheatable Eval: Dynamic Compression-Based Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Uncheatable Eval: Dynamic Compression-Based Evaluation of Language Models23 Sep 2026
- 2026Learning to Zoom Efficiently with a Contrastive Curriculum2 Sep 2026
- 2026Phantom Gains: Auditing Self-Improvement Against a Measured Null20 Aug 2026
- 2026Interpretable Humans, Alien LLMs: Expert Analysis of Latent Structures in Assessment Responses18 Aug 2026
- 2026Do Assessment Instruments Measure the Same Thing for Humans and LLMs? A Latent Structure Analysis16 Aug 2026
- 2026StatABench: Dataset and Framework for Evaluating Statistical Analysis Capabilities of LLMs22 Jun 2026
- 2026Summarization is Not Dead Yet6 Jun 2026
- 2026LiveFact: A Dynamic, Time-Aware Benchmark for LLM-Driven Fake News Detection6 Apr 2026
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases27 Feb 2026
- 2026Do Instruction-Tuned Models Always Perform Better Than Base Models? Evidence from Math and Domain-Shifted Benchmarks19 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Does Data Contamination Detection Work (Well) for LLMs? A Survey and Evaluation on Detection Assumptions
- 2026Uncertainty-based Debiasing and Unlearning for Decontamination
- 2026Calibrating Post-Training Feature Shifts for LLM Data Contamination Detection
- 2025HarmMetric Eval: Benchmarking Metrics and Judges for LLM Harmfulness Assessment
- 2026The Poisoned Chalice of LLM Evaluation Report ↗
- 2024Both Text and Images Leaked! A Systematic Analysis of Data Contamination in Multimodal LLM
- 2026Pretraining Data Exposure in Large Language Models: A Survey of Membership Inference, Data Contamination, and Security Implications
- 2025Multi-Faceted Studies on Data Poisoning can Advance LLM Development