How to Protect Models against Adversarial Unlearning?
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
AI models need to be unlearned to fulfill the requirements of legal acts such as the AI Act or GDPR, and also because of the need to remove toxic content, debiasing, the impact of malicious instances, or changes in the data distribution structure in which a model works. Unfortunately, removing knowledge may cause undesirable side effects, such as a deterioration in model performance. In this paper, we investigate the problem of adversarial unlearning, where a malicious party intentionally sends unlearn requests to deteriorate the model's performance maximally. We show that this phenomenon and the adversary's capabilities depend on many factors, primarily on the backbone model itself and strategy/limitations in selecting data to be unlearned. The main result of this work is a new method of protecting model performance from these side effects, both in the case of unlearned behavior resulting from spontaneous processes and adversary actions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.
Builds on
28 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 13
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy12 Oct
- 2024Releasing Malevolence from Benevolence: The Menace of Benign Data on Machine Unlearning6 Jul
- 2024Adversarial Machine Unlearning11 Jun
- 2023Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning19 Oct
- 2023A Duty to Forget, a Right to be Assured? Exposing Vulnerabilities in Machine Unlearning Services15 Sep
- 2023Machine Unlearning: Solutions and Challenges14 Aug
- 2023Exploring the Landscape of Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy10 May
- 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearning6 Sep
- 2022An Introduction to Machine Unlearning2 Sep
- 2022Zero-Shot Machine Unlearning14 Jan
- 2021On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning22 Oct
- 2021Hard to Forget: Poisoning Attacks on Certified Machine Unlearning17 Sep
1 more
Other references · 15
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019StarGAN v2: Diverse Image Synthesis for Multiple Domainscited by 1,098
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 618
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 460
- 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 443
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 319
- 2020Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 163
- 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 58
3 more
- 2022Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attackscited by 43
- 2023SoK: Privacy-Preserving Data Synthesiscited by 38
- 2022Machine Learning Security against Data Poisoning: Are We There Yet?cited by 23
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety
- 2024Verification of Machine Unlearning is Fragile
- 2025Adversarial Mixup Unlearning
- 2026ROKA: Robust Knowledge Unlearning against Adversaries
- 2024Gone but Not Forgotten: Improved Benchmarks for Machine Unlearning
- 2024UnUnlearning: Unlearning is not sufficient for content regulation in advanced generative AI
- 2024Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?
- 2024Reconstruction Attacks on Machine Unlearning: Simple Models are Vulnerable