Can Multimodal Foundation Models Understand Schematic Diagrams? An Empirical Study on Information-Seeking QA over Scientific Papers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces MISS-QA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the ability of models to interpret schematic diagrams within scientific literature. MISS-QA comprises 1,500 expert-annotated examples over 465 scientific papers. In this benchmark, models are tasked with interpreting schematic diagrams that illustrate research overviews and answering corresponding information-seeking questions based on the broader context of the paper. We assess the performance of 18 frontier multimodal foundation models, including o4-mini, Gemini-2.5-Flash, and Qwen2.5-VL. We reveal a significant performance gap between these models and human experts on MISS-QA. Our analysis of model performance on unanswerable questions and our detailed error analysis further highlight the strengths and limitations of current models, offering key insights to enhance models in comprehending multimodal scientific literature.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.
Builds on
19 of 30 references.
References · 19
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
- 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,599
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
- 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,050
- 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
- 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 512
7 more
- 2021A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Paperscited by 486
- 2024CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMscited by 234
- 2025MMVU: Measuring Expert-Level Multi-Discipline Video Understandingcited by 137
- 2020Challenges in Information-Seeking QA: Unanswerable Questions and Paragraph Retrievalcited by 44
- 2024Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Models: A Survey from Detection to Remediationcited by 30
- 2024M3SciQA: A Multi-Modal Multi-Document Scientific QA Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 27
- 2025SciVer: Evaluating Foundation Models for Multimodal Scientific Claim Verificationcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 9.
10 papers.
- 2025AbGen: Evaluating Large Language Models in Ablation Study Design and Evaluation for Scientific Researchcited by 13
- 2026SciFigDetect: A Benchmark for AI-Generated Scientific Figure Detectioncited by 4
- 2026SciMDR: Advancing Scientific Multimodal Document Reasoningcited by 2
- 2026Building Agent Harnesses for Scientific Curation from Multimodal Sourcescited by 1
- 2026Querying Multimodal Scientific Papers with AI: Practices and Preferences Across Blind, Low-Vision, and Sighted Scientistscited by 1
- 2026DAGverse: Building Document-Grounded Semantic DAGs from Scientific Paperscited by 0
- 2026Multimodal QUD: Inquisitive Questions from Scientific Figurescited by 0
- 2026A Systematic Survey on Image Description Techniques for STEM Domainscited by 0
- 2026BackTrend: Evaluating Scientific Weak-Signal Prediction via Backward Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2026Knossos and Ariadne: Benchmarking and Learning Complete Diagram Topology Extraction with Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Knossos and Ariadne: Benchmarking and Learning Complete Diagram Topology Extraction with Vision-Language Models3 Oct 2026
- 2026BackTrend: Evaluating Scientific Weak-Signal Prediction via Backward Reconstruction21 Sep 2026
- 2026Querying Multimodal Scientific Papers with AI: Practices and Preferences Across Blind, Low-Vision, and Sighted Scientists20 Jul 2026
- 2026Building Agent Harnesses for Scientific Curation from Multimodal Sources19 Jun 2026
- 2026A Systematic Survey on Image Description Techniques for STEM Domains22 May 2026
- 2026Multimodal QUD: Inquisitive Questions from Scientific Figures26 Apr 2026
- 2026SciFigDetect: A Benchmark for AI-Generated Scientific Figure Detection9 Apr 2026
- 2026DAGverse: Building Document-Grounded Semantic DAGs from Scientific Papers26 Mar 2026
- 2026SciMDR: Advancing Scientific Multimodal Document Reasoning12 Mar 2026
- 2025AbGen: Evaluating Large Language Models in Ablation Study Design and Evaluation for Scientific Research17 Jul 2025