mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Multimodal Foundation Models Understand Schematic Diagrams? An Empirical Study on Information-Seeking QA over Scientific Papers

arXiv 2507.10787 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces MISS-QA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the ability of models to interpret schematic diagrams within scientific literature. MISS-QA comprises 1,500 expert-annotated examples over 465 scientific papers. In this benchmark, models are tasked with interpreting schematic diagrams that illustrate research overviews and answering corresponding information-seeking questions based on the broader context of the paper. We assess the performance of 18 frontier multimodal foundation models, including o4-mini, Gemini-2.5-Flash, and Qwen2.5-VL. We reveal a significant performance gap between these models and human experts on MISS-QA. Our analysis of model performance on unanswerable questions and our detailed error analysis further highlight the strengths and limitations of current models, offering key insights to enhance models in comprehending multimodal scientific literature.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  3. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  4. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
  5. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
  6. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  7. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,599
  8. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  9. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,050
  10. 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
  11. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
  12. 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 512
7 more
  1. 2021A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Paperscited by 486
  2. 2024CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMscited by 234
  3. 2025MMVU: Measuring Expert-Level Multi-Discipline Video Understandingcited by 137
  4. 2020Challenges in Information-Seeking QA: Unanswerable Questions and Paragraph Retrievalcited by 44
  5. 2024Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Models: A Survey from Detection to Remediationcited by 30
  6. 2024M3SciQA: A Multi-Modal Multi-Document Scientific QA Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 27
  7. 2025SciVer: Evaluating Foundation Models for Multimodal Scientific Claim Verificationcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 9.

10 papers.