mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Detecting AI Assistance in Abstract Complex Tasks

arXiv 2507.10761 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2025cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting assistance from artificial intelligence is increasingly important as they become ubiquitous across complex tasks such as text generation, medical diagnosis, and autonomous driving. Aid detection is challenging for humans, especially when looking at abstract task data. Artificial neural networks excel at classification thanks to their ability to quickly learn from and process large amounts of data -- assuming appropriate preprocessing. We posit detecting help from AI as a classification task for such models. Much of the research in this space examines the classification of complex but concrete data classes, such as images. Many AI assistance detection scenarios, however, result in data that is not machine learning-friendly. We demonstrate that common models can effectively classify such data when it is appropriately preprocessed. To do so, we construct four distinct neural network-friendly image formulations along with an additional time-series formulation that explicitly encodes the exploration/exploitation of users, which allows for generalizability to other abstract tasks. We benchmark the quality of each image formulation across three classical deep learning architectures, along with a parallel CNN-RNN architecture that leverages the additional time series to maximize testing performance, showcasing the importance of encoding temporal and spatial quantities for detecting AI aid in abstract tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.

Builds on

21 of 53 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
  6. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
  7. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  8. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  9. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  10. 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 638
  11. 2019Towards Explaining the Regularization Effect of Initial Large Learning Rate in Training Neural Networkscited by 162
  12. 2020GraphNorm: A Principled Approach to Accelerating Graph Neural Network Trainingcited by 117
9 more
  1. 2020A Comparison of LSTM and BERT for Small Corpuscited by 40
  2. 2019Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?cited by 35
  3. 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Multi-Agent Learning: Catastrophe Theory Meets Game Theorycited by 17
  4. 2017The exploding gradient problem demystified - definition, prevalence, impact, origin, tradeoffs, and solutionscited by 14
  5. 2023REX: Rapid Exploration and eXploitation for AI Agentscited by 13
  6. 2018Are ResNets Provably Better than Linear Predictors?cited by 12
  7. 2020An Introduction to Neural Architecture Search for Convolutional Networkscited by 10
  8. 2019Are deep ResNets provably better than linear predictors?cited by 6
  9. 2023The Role of Heuristics and Biases During Complex Choices with an AI Teammatecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.