Effects of relational graph modularity and depth on the learning performance of neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, graph-based machine learning techniques, such as reinforcement learning and graph neural networks, have garnered significant attention. While some recent studies have started to explore the relationship between the graph structure of neural networks and their predictive performance, they often limit themselves to a narrow range of model networks, particularly lacking mesoscale structures such as communities. Our work advances this area by conducting a more comprehensive investigation, incorporating realistic network structures characterized by heterogeneous degree distributions and community structures, which are typical characteristics of many real networks. These community structures offer a nuanced perspective on network architecture. Our analysis employs model networks such as random and scale-free networks, alongside a comparison with a biological neural network and its subsets for more detailed analysis. We examine the impact of these structural attributes on the performance of image classification tasks. Our findings reveal that structural properties do affect performance to some extent. Specifically, within moderate-depth architectures, networks featuring coherent, densely interconnected communities demonstrate enhanced learning capabilities. Crucially, we find that this advantage is strictly depth-dependent: extending the architecture to eight layers reverses the effect entirely. This comparison with the biological neural network emphasizes the relevance of our findings to real-world structures, suggesting an intriguing connection worth further exploration. This study contributes meaningfully to network science and machine learning, providing insights that could inspire the design of more biologically informed neural networks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.
Builds on
15 of 48 references.
References · 15
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
- 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
- 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 787
- 2020Design Space for Graph Neural Networkscited by 182
- 2018A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicistscited by 108
- 2019Exploring Randomly Wired Neural Networks for Image Recognitioncited by 103
3 more
- 2020Graph Structure of Neural Networkscited by 68
- 202220 years of network community detectioncited by 23
- 2024A Community Detection and Graph Neural Network Based Link Prediction Approach for Scientific Literaturecited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Structural Graph Probing of Vision-Language Models
- 2024Collective variables of neural networks: empirical time evolution and scaling laws
- 2023An effective theory of collective deep learning
- 2025Information Structure in Mappings: An Approach to Learning, Representation, and Generalisation
- 2026Impact of Graph Structure on Membership-Inference Risk for Graph Neural Networks
- 2019Structural Pruning in Deep Neural Networks: A Small-World Approach
- 2026Neural networks are more modular than single neurons suggest
- 2024Exploring Neural Network Landscapes: Star-Shaped and Geodesic Connectivity