mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bridging Bots: from Perception to Action via Multimodal-LMs and Knowledge Graphs

arXiv 2507.09617 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2025cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Personal service robots are deployed to support daily living in domestic environments, particularly for elderly and individuals requiring assistance. These robots must perceive complex and dynamic surroundings, understand tasks, and execute context-appropriate actions. However, current systems rely on proprietary, hard-coded solutions tied to specific hardware and software, resulting in siloed implementations that are difficult to adapt and scale across platforms. Ontologies and Knowledge Graphs (KGs) offer a solution to enable interoperability across systems, through structured and standardized representations of knowledge and reasoning. However, symbolic systems such as KGs and ontologies struggle with raw and noisy sensory input. In contrast, multimodal language models are well suited for interpreting input such as images and natural language, but often lack transparency, consistency, and knowledge grounding. In this work, we propose a neurosymbolic framework that combines the perceptual strengths of multimodal language models with the structured representations provided by KGs and ontologies, with the aim of supporting interoperability in robotic applications. Our approach generates ontology-compliant KGs that can inform robot behavior in a platform-independent manner. We evaluated this framework by integrating robot perception data, ontologies, and five multimodal models (three LLaMA and two GPT models), using different modes of neural-symbolic interaction. We assess the consistency and effectiveness of the generated KGs across multiple runs and configurations, and perform statistical analyzes to evaluate performance. Results show that GPT-o1 and LLaMA 4 Maverick consistently outperform other models. However, our findings also indicate that newer models do not guarantee better results, highlighting the critical role of the integration strategy in generating ontology-compliant KGs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 3 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2025.

Builds on

3 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control28 Jul

Other references · 2

  1. 2018A Survey of Knowledge Representation in Service Roboticscited by 18
  2. 2023Employing Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care (longer version)cited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Combining Ontological Knowledge and Large Language Model for User-Friendly Service Robots
  2. 2026Ontological grounding for sound and natural robot explanations via large language models ↗
  3. 2025RecipeMasterLLM: Revisiting RoboEarth in the Era of Large Language Models ↗
  4. 2025MARS: Multi-Agent Robotic System with Multimodal Large Language Models for Assistive Intelligence
  5. 2026Multimodal Large Language Models for Real-Time Situated Reasoning
  6. 2026OntoPlan: An Ontology-Grounded Scene Representation and Agentic Framework for Scalable Robot Task Planning
  7. 2024Large Language Models for Robotics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectives
  8. 2025Embodied AI with Foundation Models for Mobile Service Robots: A Systematic Review