mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A CLuP algorithm to practically achieve ~ 0.76 SK--model ground state free energy

arXiv 2507.09247 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2025cond-mat.dis-nn cs.IT math.ITcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider algorithmic determination of the n-dimensional Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) spin glass model ground state free energy. It corresponds to a binary maximization of an indefinite quadratic form and under the worst case principles of the classical NP complexity theory it is hard to approximate within a log(n)const. factor. On the other hand, the SK's random nature allows (polynomial) spectral methods to typically approach the optimum within a constant factor. Naturally one is left with the fundamental question: can the residual (constant) computational gap be erased? Following the success of Controlled Loosening-up (CLuP) algorithms in planted models, we here devise a simple practical CLuP-SK algorithmic procedure for (non-planted) SK models. To analyze the typical success of the algorithm we associate to it (random) CLuP-SK models. Further connecting to recent random processes studies [94,97], we characterize the models and CLuP-SK algorithm via fully lifted random duality theory (fl RDT) [98]. Moreover, running the algorithm we demonstrate that its performance is in an excellent agrement with theoretical predictions. In particular, already for n on the order of a few thousands CLuP-SK achieves ~ 0.76 ground state free energy and remarkably closely approaches theoretical nrightarrow∞ limit ≈ 0.763. For all practical purposes, this renders computing SK model's near ground state free energy as a typically easy problem.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 126 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2025.

Builds on

24 of 126 references.

References · 24

  1. 2022Sampling from the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Gibbs measure via algorithmic stochastic localizationcited by 48
  2. 2015Subdominant Dense Clusters Allow for Simple Learning and High Computational Performance in Neural Networks with Discrete Synapsescited by 39
  3. 2019Computational Hardness of Certifying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problemscited by 30
  4. 2013Regularly random dualitycited by 23
  5. 2013Limits of local algorithms over sparse random graphscited by 23
  6. 2013Another look at the Gardner problemcited by 23
  7. 2015Local entropy as a measure for sampling solutions in Constraint Satisfaction Problemscited by 20
  8. 2018Optimization of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltoniancited by 20
  9. 2021Proof of the Contiguity Conjecture and Lognormal Limit for the Symmetric Perceptroncited by 18
  10. 2023Fully lifted random duality theorycited by 17
  11. 2013Upper-bounding ℓ1-optimization weak thresholdscited by 13
  12. 2020Algorithmic pure states for the negative spherical perceptroncited by 13
12 more
  1. 2021Binary perceptron: efficient algorithms can find solutions in a rare well-connected clustercited by 13
  2. 2023Typical and atypical solutions in non-convex neural networks with discrete and continuous weightscited by 13
  3. 2023Binary perceptrons capacity via fully lifted random duality theorycited by 13
  4. 2019Clustering of solutions in the symmetric binary perceptroncited by 12
  5. 2022Algorithms and Barriers in the Symmetric Binary Perceptron Modelcited by 12
  6. 2023Fl RDT based ultimate lowering of the negative spherical perceptron capacitycited by 11
  7. 2021Tight Lipschitz Hardness for Optimizing Mean Field Spin Glassescited by 9
  8. 2020Algorithmic Thresholds in Mean Field Spin Glassescited by 5
  9. 2025Rare dense solutions clusters in asymmetric binary perceptrons -- local entropy via fully lifted RDTcited by 5
  10. 2023Lifted RDT based capacity analysis of the 1-hidden layer treelike sign perceptrons neural networkscited by 3
  11. 2013Bounding ground state energy of Hopfield modelscited by 2
  12. 2018The algorithmic hardness threshold for continuous random energy modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.