mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Convergence: Shuffling Complexity Beyond Lipschitz Smoothness

arXiv 2507.08913 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2025cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Shuffling-type gradient methods are favored in practice for their simplicity and rapid empirical performance. Despite extensive development of convergence guarantees under various assumptions in recent years, most require the Lipschitz smoothness condition, which is often not met in common machine learning models. We highlight this issue with specific counterexamples. To address this gap, we revisit the convergence rates of shuffling-type gradient methods without assuming Lipschitz smoothness. Using our stepsize strategy, the shuffling-type gradient algorithm not only converges under weaker assumptions but also match the current best-known convergence rates, thereby broadening its applicability. We prove the convergence rates for nonconvex, strongly convex, and non-strongly convex cases, each under both random reshuffling and arbitrary shuffling schemes, under a general bounded variance condition. Numerical experiments further validate the performance of our shuffling-type gradient algorithm, underscoring its practical efficacy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2025.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 716
  3. 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 335
  4. 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 303
  5. 2020Large-Scale Methods for Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 179
  6. 2020Random Reshuffling: Simple Analysis with Vast Improvementscited by 112
  7. 2023Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed Assumptionscited by 97
  8. 2020Improved Analysis of Clipping Algorithms for Non-convex Optimizationcited by 88
  9. 2022Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGDcited by 80
  10. 2015Why Random Reshuffling Beats Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 78
  11. 2018Random Shuffling Beats SGD after Finite Epochscited by 66
  12. 2019How Good is SGD with Random Shuffling?cited by 63
11 more
  1. 2020A Unified Convergence Analysis for Shuffling-Type Gradient Methodscited by 57
  2. 2020SGD with shuffling: optimal rates without component convexity and large epoch requirementscited by 57
  3. 2021Acceleration Methodscited by 48
  4. 2023Convex and Non-convex Optimization Under Generalized Smoothnesscited by 44
  5. 2021Non-convex Distributionally Robust Optimization: Non-asymptotic Analysiscited by 39
  6. 2023Generalized-Smooth Nonconvex Optimization is As Efficient As Smooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 35
  7. 2022Provable Adaptivity of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothnesscited by 30
  8. 2023Variance-reduced Clipping for Non-convex Optimizationcited by 22
  9. 2021Random Reshuffling with Variance Reduction: New Analysis and Better Ratescited by 19
  10. 2016Without-Replacement Sampling for Stochastic Gradient Methods: Convergence Results and Application to Distributed Optimizationcited by 4
  11. 2015Efficient Distributed SGD with Variance Reductioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.