mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Impact of Pretraining Word Co-occurrence on Compositional Generalization in Multimodal Models

arXiv 2507.08000 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

CLIP and large multimodal models (LMMs) have better accuracy on examples involving concepts that are highly represented in the training data. However, the role of concept combinations in the training data on compositional generalization is largely unclear -- for instance, how does accuracy vary when a common object appears in an uncommon pairing with another object? In this paper, we investigate how word co-occurrence statistics in the pretraining dataset (a proxy for co-occurrence of visual concepts) impacts CLIP/LMM performance. To disentangle the effects of word co-occurrence frequencies from single-word frequencies, we measure co-occurrence with pointwise mutual information (PMI), which normalizes the joint probability of two words co-occurring by the probability of co-occurring independently. Using synthetically generated images with a variety of concept pairs, we show a strong correlation between PMI in the CLIP pretraining data and zero-shot accuracy in CLIP models trained on LAION-400M (r=0.97 and 14% accuracy gap between images in the top and bottom 5% of PMI values), demonstrating that even accuracy on common concepts is affected by the combination of concepts in the image. Leveraging this finding, we reproduce this effect in natural images by editing them to contain pairs with varying PMI, resulting in a correlation of r=0.75. Finally, we demonstrate that this behavior in CLIP transfers to LMMs built on top of CLIP (r=0.70 for TextVQA, r=0.62 for VQAv2). Our findings highlight the need for algorithms and architectures that improve compositional generalization in multimodal models without scaling the training data combinatorially. Our code is available at https://github.com/helenqu/multimodal-pretraining-pmi.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 38 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.

Builds on

38 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Models13 Oct
  2. 2024A Sober Look at the Robustness of CLIPs to Spurious Features18 Mar
  3. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionality26 Jun
  4. 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?13 Dec
  5. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct

Other references · 33

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  6. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  7. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  8. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
  9. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  10. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
  11. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  12. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
21 more
  1. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
  2. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
  3. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  4. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  5. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
  6. 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 838
  7. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 798
  8. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  9. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
  10. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
  11. 2023OpenFlamingo: An Open-Source Framework for Training Large Autoregressive Vision-Language Modelscited by 565
  12. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
  13. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  14. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
  15. 2022Data Determines Distributional Robustness in Contrastive Language Image Pre-training (CLIP)cited by 138
  16. 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
  17. 2024No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performancecited by 75
  18. 2024The Neglected Tails in Vision-Language Modelscited by 63
  19. 2021COVR: A test-bed for Visually Grounded Compositional Generalization with real imagescited by 25
  20. 2024Deciphering the Role of Representation Disentanglement: Investigating Compositional Generalization in CLIP Modelscited by 13
  21. 2025Pretraining Frequency Predicts Compositional Generalization of CLIP on Real-World Taskscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023How Do In-Context Examples Affect Compositional Generalization?
  2. 2023The Role of Linguistic Priors in Measuring Compositional Generalization of Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025When and How Does CLIP Enable Domain and Compositional Generalization?
  4. 2026Diagnosing the Sources of Compositional Failure in Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Analysis
  5. 2026What Does the Caption Really Say? Counterfactual Phrase Intervention for Compositional Data Selection in Vision-Language Pretraining
  6. 2026Correlation-Weighted Multi-Reward Optimization for Compositional Generation
  7. 2024Language Plays a Pivotal Role in the Object-Attribute Compositional Generalization of CLIP
  8. 2026Cross-Modal Masked Compositional Concept Modeling for Enhancing Visio-Linguistic Compositionality